Statement (1) deals with verifiable data. Hence it is a Fact. Statement (2) mentions a verifiable fact, wiz; that the judiciary does not have an all India selection process. Hence it is a fact. Statement (3) talks about improving quality if judicial personal and suggest that, uniformity of standards will help. This is just an assumption and no concrete fact exits to prove it will happen so. Hence it is a judgement. Statement (4) also talks about improving quality which in actuality depends/varies from person to person. Hence it is a judgment.
Hence option (2) is the answer