CameraIcon
CameraIcon
SearchIcon
MyQuestionIcon
MyQuestionIcon
1
You visited us 1 times! Enjoying our articles? Unlock Full Access!
Question

A. By the turn of the century it did not seem extraordinary that managers should manage by walking about.
B. The outside world filtered through via a secretary who, traditionally, sat like a guard dog in front of their (usually closed) office door.
C. But in the 1950s many white-collar managers turned their offices into fortresses from which they rarely emerged.
D. The technologies of mobile communications made it so much easier for them to both walk about and stay in touch at the same time.
E. Edicts were sent out to the blue-collar workforce whom they rarely met face-to-face.


A

ACBDE

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
B

ABCDE

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
C

ADBCE

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
D

ADCEB

Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses
Open in App
Solution

The correct option is D

ADCEB


D essentially follows A as it explains how managers manage by 'walking about'. The probable options are hence only (D) or (C). B follows C and E as it continues with the idea of turning their offices into a fortress and a secretary who sits in front of the closed door.


flag
Suggest Corrections
thumbs-up
0
similar_icon
Similar questions
Q. The majority of successful senior managers do not closely follow the classical rational model of first clarifying goals, assessing the problem, formulating options, estimating likelihoods of success, making a decision, and only then taking action to implement the decision. Rather, in their day-by-day tactical manoeuvres, these senior executives rely on what is vaguely termed “intuition” to manage a network of interrelated problems that require them to deal with ambiguity, inconsistency, novelty, and surprise; and to integrate action into the process of thinking.
Generations of writers on management have recognized that some practicing managers rely heavily on intuition. In general, however, such writers display a poor grasp of what intuition is. Some see it as the opposite of rationality; others view it as an excuse for capriciousness.
Isenberg’s recent research on the cognitive processes of senior managers reveals that managers’ intuition is neither of these. Rather, senior managers use intuition in at least five distinct ways. First, they intuitively sense when a problem exists. Second, managers rely on intuition to perform well-learned behaviour patterns rapidly. This intuition is not arbitrary or irrational, but is based on years of painstaking practice and hands-on experience that build skills. A third function of intuition is to synthesize isolated bits of data and practice into an integrated picture, often in an “Aha!” experience. Fourth, some managers use intuition as a check on the results of more rational analysis. Most senior executives are familiar with the formal decision analysis models and tools, and those who use such systematic methods for reaching decisions are occasionally leery of solutions suggested by these methods, which run counter to their sense of the correct course of action. Finally, managers can use intuition to bypass in-depth analysis and move rapidly to engender a plausible solution. Used in this way, intuition is an almost instantaneous cognitive process in which a manager recognizes familiar patterns. One of the implications of the intuitive style of executive management is that “thinking” is inseparable from acting. Since managers often “know” what is right before they can analyse and explain it, they frequently act first and explain later. Analysis is inextricably tied to action in thinking/acting cycles, in which managers develop thoughts about their companies and organizations not by analysing a problematic situation and then acting, but by acting and analysing in close concert. Given the great uncertainty of many of the management issues that they face, senior managers often instigate a course of action simply to learn more about an issue. They then use the results of the action to develop a more complete understanding of the issue. One Implication of thinking/acting cycles is that action is often part of defining the problem, not just of implementing the solution.
Q. The passage provides support for which of the following statements?
Q. Read the following passage and answer the question that follows.

The open-plan office is a terrible, horrible, no good, very bad idea Not because there aren’t people who actually enjoy working in an open office, there are. Quite a few, actually. But they’re in the distinct minority. The vast majority of people either dislike the open office or downright hate it. So how is that going to work, exactly?
By force, of course! Open offices are more appealing to people in management because they needn’t protect their own time and attention as much. Few managers have a schedule that allows, or even requires, long hours of uninterrupted time dedicated to a single creative pursuit.
And it’s these managers who are in charge of designing office layouts and signing leases. It’s also these managers who are responsible for booking photo shots of the FUN-FUN office, giving tours to investors, and fielding interviews with journalists. The open office is an excellent backdrop for all those activities.
What it isn’t, though, is conducive to better collaboration. A new study shows that the number one argument for the open office, increased collaboration, is invalid. Converting traditional offices with walls and doors and separation into open-plan offices causes face-to-face interaction to plummet, not rise. People try to shield their attention (and sanity!) by retreating into headphone-clad cocoons, and instead rely on instant messaging or email to interact.

Q. The author thinks that the open offices are a bad idea because?

1. The people who actually like it are a minority so it is not worthy of implementation.
2. The only people who like it more than those who work there are the managers
3. The interaction between people in open offices is lower than traditional office spaces.

Which of the above reasons is/are above valid?

निम्नलिखित गद्यांश को पढ़कर प्रश्न का उत्तर दें:

ओपन-प्लान ऑफिस एक निरर्थक और बहुत बुरा विचार है,इसलिए नहीं कि ऐसे लोग नहीं हैं जो वास्तव में एक खुले कार्यालय में काम करना पसंद करते हैं(ऐसे लोग हैं वास्तव में कुछ संख्या में हैं),लेकिन वे अल्पसंख्यक हैं।अधिकांश लोग या तो खुले कार्यालय को नापसंद करते हैं या स्पष्ट रूप से घृणा करते हैं।तो यह वास्तव में किस प्रकार काम करने जा रहा है?
बेशक बलपूर्वक! खुले कार्यालय लोगों को प्रबंधन में अधिक आकर्षित करते हैं क्योंकि उन्हें अपने स्वयं के समय बचाने और अधिक ध्यान देने की आवश्यकता नहीं होती है।कुछ प्रबंधकों का शेड्यूल होता है,यह अनुमति देता है, या यहां तक कि आवश्यकता होती है,एकल रचनात्मक कार्य के लिए निर्बाध समय के लंबे घंटों की।
ये प्रबंधक कार्यालय लेआउट को डिज़ाइन करने और ठेकों पर हस्ताक्षर करने के प्रभारी होते हैं। ये ऐसे प्रबंधक भी हैं जो FUN-FUN कार्यालय के फोटो शॉट्स की बुकिंग,निवेशकों को पर्यटन पर ले जाने और पत्रकारों के साथ साक्षात्कार देने के लिए जिम्मेदार होते हैं।ओपन ऑफिस उन सभी गतिविधियों के लिए एक उत्कृष्ट जगह है।हालांकि, यह बेहतर सहयोग के लिए अनुकूल नहीं है।एक नए अध्ययन से पता चलता है कि खुले कार्यालय, सहयोग में वृद्धि के लिए जो तर्क देते हैं उनकी संख्या कम है।दीवारों, दरवाज़ों और पार्टीशन वाले पारंपरिक कार्यालयों को खुले-कार्यालयों में बदलने से आमने-सामने बातचीत होगी।लोग हेडफोन,मैसेजिंग या ईमेल के सहारे अपना ध्यान केंद्रित करने का प्रयास करते हैं।

Q. लेखक क्यों सोचता है कि ओपन ऑफिस एक बुरा विचार है?

1. जो लोग वास्तव में इसे पसंद करते हैं, वे अल्पसंख्यक हैं इसलिए यह क्रियान्वयन के योग्य नहीं है।
2. वहां काम करने वाले लोगों के बजाय केवल प्रबंधक इसे पसंद करते हैं।
3. खुले कार्यालयों में लोगों के बीच बातचीत पारंपरिक कार्यालय की तुलना में कम होती है।

उपरोक्त कारणों में कौन सा/से अधिक मान्य है/हैं?
View More
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
similar_icon
Related Videos
thumbnail
lock
Political Climate in Indian in the 1980s
HISTORY
Watch in App
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
CrossIcon