CameraIcon
CameraIcon
SearchIcon
MyQuestionIcon


Question

Consider the following cases.
  1. Berubari case 
  2. Kesavananda Bharti v. State of Kerala case
  3. LIC of India v. Consumer Education and Research centre case
  4. Golaknath v Union of India.
Which of the following are NOT related to status of the Preamble as the part of the Constitution?
 
  1. Only 2 & 4 
  2. All of these
  3. Only 1 & 2
  4. Only1, 2 & 3


Solution

The correct option is D Only1, 2 & 3
Preamble is a part of the constitution. 
Following landmark cases need to be known in this regard. :-
  1. 1960 – In the Berubari case the Supreme Court ruled that Preamble is not a part of Constitution
  2. 1973 – In the KesavanandaBharati v. State of Kerala case the Supreme Court rejected  the earlier opinion and held that Preamble is a part of the Constitution. The Court said that the Constitution could not be amended so as to alter the basic elements.
  3. 1995 – In LIC of India v. Consumer Education and Research centre case the Supreme Court again held that the Preamble is an integral part of the Indian Constitution.
  4. In SR Bommai Case the supreme court held that Preamble Indicates basic structure of the Constitution.

flag
 Suggest corrections
thumbs-up
 
0 Upvotes


Similar questions
View More...


People also searched for
QuestionImage
QuestionImage
View More...



footer-image