wiz-icon
MyQuestionIcon
MyQuestionIcon
1
You visited us 1 times! Enjoying our articles? Unlock Full Access!
Question

Fill in the blank with a suitable option:
According to chart 2, the years 2000-2010 were characterized by ______________.
490439.JPG

A
less growth in metropolitan areas of all sizes than had taken place in the 1990s
Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses
B
more growth in small metropolitan areas than in large metropolitan areas
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
C
a significant decline in the population of small metropolitan areas compared to the 1980s
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
D
roughly equal growth in large metropolitan areas and non-metropolitan areas
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
Open in App
Solution

The correct option is A less growth in metropolitan areas of all sizes than had taken place in the 1990s

Here, Chart 2 shows that the growth of all metropolitan areas in the 1990s was higher than the growth in all metropolitan areas in the 2000s: large metro areas experienced a growth of 14.3% in the 1990s versus a growth of 10.9% in the 2000s, small metro areas experienced a growth of 13.1% in the 1990s versus a growth of 10.3% in the 2000s, and non‑metro areas experienced a growth of 9.0% in the 1990s versus a growth of 4.5% in the 2000s. So, option A is the correct answer.

Options B, C, and D are incorrect because they do not accurately characterize the U S growth rate by metro size from 2000‑2010 as illustrated in Chart 2.



flag
Suggest Corrections
thumbs-up
0
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
similar_icon
Related Videos
thumbnail
lock
Cities
CIVICS
Watch in App
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
CrossIcon