Statement: Education is in the 'concurrent list' and therefore states are unable to reform the education quickly without the consent of the central government.
Conclusions I State and central governments are not keen to reform education.
II 'Education' should be an exclusively state subject if quick reform required.

Open in App

Solution

The statement is evidencing the reason for the delay in reforming education. Nowhere it is stated that the central and the state governments are not keen to reform education.
So, conclusion I does not follow.
The statement does not imply anything about the remedial measures to overcome this delay.
Hence, conclusion II does not follow.

Suggest Corrections

Similar questions

Statement:Should ‘education’ be brought under the control of the Central Government like defense?

Argument:

I. No, education is a state subject and it should remain with the state.

II. Yes, this is the only way to establish uniformly in growth of education across the states.

Q. The central government came up with an education policy called the ‘New Education Policy’ in the year .

Q. Amartya Sen insisted that land reforms, education and health are essential for eradicating ___________ and thus, the Government must prioritize its spending towards these fields.

Based on the Regional Centre for Biotechnology Bill – 2016, the Central Government set up the Regional Centre for Biotechnology Training and Education in which State?

Q. How does the state government encouraging tribal education in Maharashtra?