Within socialism, social democracy is a left-wing political, social, and economic theory that promotes political and economic democracy. It is defined as a policy regime that supports economic and social interventions to advance social justice inside the framework of a liberal-democratic polity and a mixed economy that is capitalist-oriented. A dedication to representative and participatory democracy, mechanisms for income redistribution, management of the economy in the public interest, and social welfare policies are the protocols and conventions utilised to achieve this. Political circles began to associate social democracy with Keynesianism, the Nordic model, the social-liberal paradigm, as well as welfare states in the late 20th century as a result of social democratic parties’ sustained leadership during the post-war consensus and their impact on socioeconomic policy in Northern and Western Europe. It has been referred to as both the reformist branch of democratic socialism and the most prevalent variety of Western or contemporary socialism.

The topic has a chance of being asked as a UPSC Prelims Polity Question or as a Current Affairs Question.

Note: UPSC 2023 is approaching closer, supplement your preparation with the free Daily Video Analysis of The Hindu Newspaper by BYJU’S.

Social Democracy UPSC Notes PDF –Download PDF Here

About Social Democracy

One of several socialist traditions is social democracy. It is a political movement that seeks to bring about socialism gradually and democratically. Over the course of its history, social democracy has taken on a number of significant shapes as a global political movement and ideology. Social democracy changed from “organised Marxism” in the 19th century to “organised reformism” in the 20th. As a system of government, social democracy involves promoting a mixed economy and working-class welfare programmes within democratic capitalism. A social democratic policy regime by the twenty-first century is typically described as an expansion in welfare policies or an increase in public services, and the Nordic model may be used interchangeably.

While they are distinguished when used in journalism, democratic socialism and social democracy are typically considered synonyms in political science. According to this democratic socialist definition, social democracy is a political philosophy that aims to progressively erect a socialist alternative economy using liberal democratic institutions. Beginning in the post-war era, social democracy was described as a political system that favoured changing capitalism to conform to the moral principles of social justice. It included a wide range of both non-revolutionary and revolutionary currents of socialism in the 19th century, but anarchism was not included. Early in the 20th century, the term “social democracy” evolved to indicate support for a methodical process of advancing socialism through already-in place political structures and resistance to revolutionary methods of doing so.

Philosophy of Social Democracy

Social democracy opposes the either/or understanding of capitalism against socialism as a type of reformist democratic socialism. It contends that encouraging the development of capitalism will lead to the eventual transformation of a capitalist economy into a socialist one. Certain social rights, including universal access to public services like education, healthcare, workers’ compensation, and other services like child care and senior care, should be legally guaranteed to all citizens. Social Democrats support the elimination of all forms of discrimination, including those based on age, social class, language, ethnicity, gender, race, and sexual orientation. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels began to believe, later in their lives, that in some nations, workers could be able to pursue their goals through peaceful methods.  While both Marx and Engels remained devoted to the social revolution, Engels claimed that socialists were evolutionists in this sense.

Social democracy Vs Democratic Socialism

Even though they are typically set apart from one another, social democracy and democratic socialism have some notable overlap in terms of actual policy ideas. Democratic socialism is social democracy as it existed before the 1970s, when many social democratic parties adopted the Third Way ideology, acknowledging capitalism as the status quo for the moment and trying to redefine socialism in a way that preserves the capitalist structure. This Third Way ideology replaced Keynesianism as the dominant postwar ideology with monetarism and neoliberalism. Similar to contemporary social democracy, democratic socialism often takes an evolutionary, as opposed to a revolutionary, route to socialism. Commonly endorsed Keynesian policies include some economic regulation, social insurance programmes, public pension plans, and a steady increase in public ownership over large and strategic industries.

History of Social Democracy

Social democracy has roots in the socialist movement of the late 19th century. In opposition to the radical socialist orientation to transition associated with orthodox Marxism, it came to support a progressive and peaceful transition from capitalism to socialism, using current political mechanisms. Early post-war social democratic parties in Western Europe opposed the Stalinist political and economic system that was in place in the Soviet Union at the time and pledged allegiance to either socialism as an alternative or a balance between capitalism and socialism. Social Democrats supported a mixed economic system based on the predominance of private property throughout this time, with only a small percentage of critical utilities and public services being owned by the government. While placing less emphasis on the objective of substituting the capitalist system (factor markets, private property, as well as wage labour) with a qualitatively new socialist economic system, social democrats championed Keynesian economics, state interventionism, and even the welfare state.

Note: UPSC 2023 is approaching closer, keep yourself updated with the latest UPSC current affairs where we explain the important news in a simplified manner.

Note: You can make your current affairs revision robust using Free Monthly Magazines by BYJU’S.

Significance of Social Democracy

Social democracy differs from other contemporary versions of democratic socialism in that it seeks to humanise capitalism and provide the conditions for it to produce more democratic, equitable, and solidaristic outcomes while maintaining socialism as a long-term objective. It is characterised by a dedication to measures intended to reduce inequality, end oppression of disadvantaged groups, and end poverty, as well as by support for publicly funded services that are available to everyone, including child care, education, senior care, healthcare, and workers’ compensation. It has close ties to the labour movement and trade unions, supporting measures to provide workers with the right to collective bargaining and to expand political decision-making into the economic sector through co-determination, or social ownership, for stakeholders and employees. The Third Way is an ideology that emerged in the 1990s and is occasionally connected to social democratic parties. Some observers have labelled the Third Way as a component of the neoliberal movement. It purportedly tries to combine liberal economics and social democratic welfare policies.

Critique of Social Democracy

Other socialists criticises social democracy because it seeks to strengthen the capitalist system, which contradicts the socialist goal of substituting capitalism with a socialist system. This point of view claims that social democracy falls short in addressing the systemic problems endemic to capitalism. Social democracy and democratic socialism are contrasted by the American democratic socialist philosopher David Schweickart, who characterises the former as an effort to strengthen the welfare state and the latter as a competing economic system to capitalism. The democratic socialist critique of social democracy, according to Schweickart, holds that capitalism will never be fully humanised and that any attempts to repress its economic tensions will simply lead to their reemergence in other places. He uses the example that measures to lower unemployment excessively would cause inflation and that efforts to provide excessive job security would undermine labour discipline. Democratic socialists support a post-capitalist economic system that relies on either a market economy integrated with workers’ self-management or on some type of participatory, decentralised planning of the economy, as opposed to social democracy’s mixed economy.

The social democratic welfare states are also criticised by market socialism. Greater social and economic equality is a goal shared by both ideologies, but market socialism achieves this through changes in enterprise ownership and management, while social democracy makes an effort to achieve this through subsidies and taxes on privately owned businesses to fund welfare programmes. Some critics contend that by endorsing Keynesian welfare capitalism in the 1930s, social democracy abandoned socialism. Both the left and the right have challenged social democracy’s reformism because if the left were to run a capitalist economy, it would have to do so using capitalist, not socialist, reasoning. As a prominent opponent of reformist social democrats, Joseph Stalin later coined the phrase “social fascism” to depict social democracy in the 1930s, a time when it accepted a corporatist economic model similar to that advocated by fascism. The Communist International accepted this viewpoint, claiming that capitalism had entered the Third Period and that a proletarian revolution was about to break out but might be stopped by social democrats and other fascist forces.

Keynesian Economics

The fundamental principle of this school of thought is that economic stabilisation may be achieved by government involvement. Existing economic theory was unable to adequately explain the causes of the severe global economic collapse during the Great Depression of the 1930s or to offer a public policy solution to jump-start output and employment. John Maynard Keynes, a British economist, was the driving force behind an economic paradigm shift that challenged the then-dominant belief that full employment would be produced by free markets if workers were willing to be flexible in their wage expectations. The central tenet of Keynes’ theory is the claim that the most significant economic driver is aggregate demand, which is the sum of consumer, company, and government spending. Keynes argued further that there are no self-balancing forces in open markets that produce full employment. Keynesian economists use public policies that seek to attain full employment and price stability to defend government intervention.

Nordic Model

The economic and social policies, as well as the customs and traditions of the Nordic nations, make up the Nordic model (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden). With a sizable portion of the workforce unionised and a sizable portion of the population working in the public sector (roughly 30% of the workforce in fields like healthcare, education, and government), this entails a comprehensive welfare state as well as multi-level collective bargaining based on the economic principles of social corporatism. The Nordic model gained popularity after World War II, despite having been created in the 1930s under the direction of social democrats.

Though Finland and Iceland have both been republics since the 20th century, the three Scandinavian nations are constitutional monarchies. The Nordic nations, all of which use proportional representation in their electoral systems and have unicameral forms of government as of 2021, are characterised as being highly democratic. Although the Nordic nations have some notable contrasts from one another, they all share similar characteristics. These include a commitment to private ownership of property/means of production within a market-based mixed economy, with Norway being a partial exception because of a large number of public sector enterprises and support for a corporatist system that involves a tripartite setup where representatives of labour and employers negotiate wages and labour market policy is mediated by the government As of 2020, all of the Nordic nations are ranked among the top 10 in the World Happiness Report, the inequality-adjusted HDI, and the Global Peace Index.

Note: You may get all the Polity Questions for the UPSC Mains exam by visiting the linked article.

Start your IAS Exam preparation by understanding the UPSC Syllabus in-depth and planning your approach accordingly.

Related Links: