The syllogism is an integral part of all the aptitude questions papers. It falls under the category of logical reasoning. Over the years syllogisms have achieved an important place in the aptitude exams, due to its mystifying nature.
For most Government exams, the topic of syllogism is very common, and questions are most definitely asked in the exam, as seen in the past few years. Thus, understanding the concept well is extremely important.
Looking for tips to ace the Reasoning Ability section in the upcoming competitive exams?? Practise more with the help of links given below: |
It is advised to solve the question of the syllogism as the last question of attempt as it requires a lot of patience and logical level of analysis. Following is the list of exams where the questions of syllogisms are frequent.
List of exams:-
- UPSC CAPF
- Bank Exams
- Staff Selection Commission
- RBI Exams
- SBI Exams
- IBPS Exams
- IBPS PO
- IBPS Clerk
- IBPS Specialist Officer
- IBPS RRB (Regional Rural Bank)
- IBPS RRB PO (Officer Scale I)
- IBPS RRB Clerk (Officer Assistant – Multipurpose)
- Officer Scale II & III
- FCI Manager
- Insurance Exams
Following is the list of topics of syllogisms
- Introduction to syllogisms
- Statements of syllogisms
- Application of Venn diagrams
- Logical deduction
- Steps to solve syllogism questions
- Solved examples
An interactive explanation may help candidates analyse and understand the concept even better. Thus, candidates can check the detailed explanation of the concept of syllogism along with a few simple tips to answer questions in the video given below:
What is Syllogism?
The word syllogism is derived from the Greek word “syllogismos” which means “conclusion, inference”. Syllogisms are a logical argument of statements using deductive reasoning to arrive at a conclusion. The major contribution to the filed of syllogisms is attributed to Aristotle.
To know more about Govt Exams, check at the linked article.
The questions which are asked in this section contain two or more statements, and two or more conclusions follow these statements. One has to find out which of these conclusions logically follow the given statements. The statements have to be taken true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts.
There are many ways of solving questions of syllogisms. The most effective and efficient method of all is using a Venn diagram. Based on the given statements, one should draw all the possible diagrams and then solve each of these diagrams separately. Finally, the answer common to all the diagrams is taken as the correct one.
Statements of syllogisms
The questions of syllogisms of three main parts.
- Major premise
- Minor premise
- Conclusion
The central premise is a statement in general, believed to be true by the author.
Example: All women are smart.
The minor premise is a specific example of the major premise.
Example: Amanda is a woman.
The conclusion is a specific statement which logically follows both major and minor statement.
Example: Amanda is smart.
Application of Venn diagrams
To identify whether the given conclusion is correct or not draw the Venn diagrams according to major and minor statements.
The above represents the combination of major and minor statements in two different ways. In the first case, the statement “ All women are smart “ the Venn diagram of women is inside the Venn diagram of smart. Hence the major statement is true. And since Amanda is a woman, the Venn diagram representing Amanda should be inside Woman. In the second case, the only difference is, the major statement “ All women are smart “ the Venn diagrams of Women and smart are overlapping with each other. Because that’s another possibility. Since Amanda is women, it is represented inside it. Observing both the cases, we can agree that the conclusion given “ Amanda is a smart “ is true from both the case.
Note: The conclusion should be true according to all the possible cases. One should draw all possible cases before arriving at a conclusion. Below the table that provides that correct combination of Venn diagrams of major and minor premises.
Other Related Links | |
Data Sufficiency | Statement and Assumption |
Reasoning Puzzles | Seating Arrangement |
Statement and Conclusion | Blood Relations |
Logical deduction
Major premise | Minor premise | Conclusion | Conclusion True/false |
All dogs are cats. | All cats are bulls. | All bulls are dogs. | False(it’s true only according to 3rd case) |
All dogs are cats. | All cats are bulls. | All dogs are bulls. | It’s true( In all the three cases) |
Steps to solve syllogism questions:
- Note the number of variables present in the given statements
Ex: Man, doctor, pilot, etc.
- Draw a Venn diagram corresponding to each variable; several Venn diagrams is equal to the number of variables.
- Deduce the logical level by reading the statements and draw the corresponding Venn diagram
- Check the conclusions given by comparing it with the Venn diagram obtained
- Select the correct conclusion.
The following table gives the correct representation of Venn diagrams applying the above rules.
Variables | Number of variables | Best possible representation |
Thief, Robber | 2 | |
Women, Mothers, and Engineers. | 3 | |
Bangalore, India, Asia, Karnatka. | 4 |
Solved examples:
Type 1 questions of syllogisms
Instructions: Observe the following statements and select if the conclusion is
Correct/ Incorrect
Example 1:
Major premise: All Actors are right-handed.
Minor premise: All right-handed are Artists.
The conclusion is: Some Artists are Actors.
A. Correct
B. Incorrect
Solution:
Explanation:
Case 1:
The Venn diagram of actors is inside right-handed and which in turn is inside the Venn of artists. According to the diagram, the portion of the red Venn diagram overlapping with green indicates that some actors artist are actors. Hence the conclusion is correct according to this diagram, but can not be concluded as the final answer until the second case is checked.
Case 2: Since all the Venn diagrams are overlapping with each other, according to the diagram all the artists are actors or all the actors are artists. Hence the conclusion is “ some artists are actors” is wrong. Since the conclusion is wrong according to the second Venn diagram. The correct answer will be option B incorrect.
Instructions: Observe the following premises and select if the conclusion is
Correct/ Incorrect
Example 2:
Major premise: No pencil is cloth.
Minor premise: No sweaters are pencils.
The conclusion is: All sweaters are cloth
A. Correct
B. Incorrect
Solution:
Explanation:
In this case, as can be seen, there are three possible scenarios.
Since “ No pencil is cloth” The diagram of pencil and cloth do not have any overlapping. Hence, they are just touching each other( the diagram can also be represented by keeping them apart, but that will not affect the logical conclusion). According to the minor premise, since no sweaters are pencils, the diagrams of sweaters and pencil do not overlap.
Case 1: If no sweaters are pencil, one possibility is there can be no sweater which is no cloth also.
Case 2: There can be a sweater which is also cloth. Hence a part of sweater and cloth overlap with each other.
Case 3: All clothes can be a sweater, as there is not any promise which says this combination is not possible.
The conclusion “all sweaters are cloths” is correct only according to 3rd case but not with respect to the 1st and 2nd case. Hence the conclusion is incorrect.
For questions from the various other topics under the reasoning ability section, candidates can visit the Logical Reasoning Questions page.
Type 2 questions of syllogisms.
Observe the following premises and select the correct conclusion.
Example 3:
Major premise: All engineers are innovative.
Minor premise: All students are engineers.
Conclusions:
- All innovative are students
- All students are innovative
- No innovative are students
- No engineers are students
Solution:
Explanation:
The first conclusion “ All innovative are students” is wrong according to case 1 and case 2. The second conclusion is correct in all three cases. Conclusion 3 and 4 are not correct according to all the three cases. Hence the correct answer is option B.
Example 4:
Major premise: No computers are televisions.
Minor premise: All radios are televisions.
Conclusions:
- All radios are computers
- No radios are computers
- All computers are radio
- None of the above
Explanation:
The conclusion “ All radios are computers” is not true according to both the Venn diagrams. The second conclusion is true, according to both the diagrams. As both the Venn diagrams do not overlap with each other anywhere. The conclusion “ All computers are radio” is also wrong according to both the diagrams. Hence the correct answer is option B.
Type 3 questions of syllogisms.
Example 5:
Statements:
- All Stones are Hammers
- No Hammer is Ring
- Some rings are doors
- All doors are windows
Conclusions:
- Some hammers are stones
- Some windows are rings
- Only (1) conclusion follows
- Only (2) conclusion follows
- Either(1) or (2) follows
- Neither(1) nor (2) follows
- Both (1) and (2) follow
Solution:
Explanation:
The first conclusion “Some hammers are stones” is not true according to case 5, where all the shammers are stones. The second conclusion” Some windows are rings “ is true in all the three cases. Hence the correct answer option is B.
Example 6:
Statements:
All cups are books.
All books are shirts.
Conclusions:
i. Some cups are not shirts.
ii. Some shirts are cups.
- Only (1) conclusion follows
- Only (2) conclusion follows
- Either(1) or (2) follows
- Neither(1) nor (2) follows
- Both (1) and (2) follow
Solution:
Explanation:
Four combinations of Venn diagrams are possible according to the two premises. The first conclusion “some cups are not shirts” is not true in all the three cases, as all the cups are shirts in every case. The second conclusion “ some shorts are cups” is true only in the first three cases, whereas in the last case it’s not true(all the shirts are cups). Hence neither conclusion 1 nor 2 is correct. Hence the correct answer is option D.
Interested candidates can get more questions based on this concept on the Syllogism Questions page.
The logical reasoning part can be the most scoring part in almost all major Government exams and candidates must ensure that they practise more to score better in the final exams.
Aspirants can refer to BYJU’S for any further assistance.
Further analysis of the concept has been given in the video below: