Malimath Committee was headed by Justice V.S. Malimath, former Chief Justice of the Karnataka and Kerala High Courts. This Committee began its work in 2000 when it was constituted by the Home Ministry. The Report related to the criminal justice system in India was submitted to Deputy Prime Minister L.K. Advani, who was also in charge of the Home portfolio, in 2003. This article throws light on the objectives of the committee, the recommendation given by it, and the drawbacks.
Aspirants would find this article very helpful while preparing for the IAS Exam.
|Aspirants should enhance their preparation by solving UPSC Previous Year Question Papers now!!
To complement your preparation for the upcoming exam, check the following links:
Malimath Committee – Objective
- The task of examining the fundamental principles of criminal law to restore confidence in the criminal justice system.
|What is the Criminal Justice System?
- This involved reviewing the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973, the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, and the Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860.
Malimath Committee – Recommendations
- The 158 recommendations of the committee, arrived at after examining several national systems of criminal law, especially the continental European systems, essentially propose a shift from an adversarial criminal justice system, where the respective versions of the facts are presented by the prosecution and the defence before a neutral judge, to an inquisitorial system, where the objective is the “quest for truth” and the judicial officer controls the investigation of offences.
- Its report has suggested the dilution of many of the pre-trial safeguards against violence in police custody that an accused has.
- For instance, it seeks to double the 90-day period available for filing a charge-sheet after which an accused can be released on bail.
- It also recommends that the permissible 15-day police remand of an accused be doubled for grave offences.
- Malimath Committee seems to have concentrated on the rights of the victim. It mentions the need to formulate a witness protection programme, reclassify offences, and involve the victim in all stages of the trial.
- On the question of making investigations more effective, it suggests the setting up of a State Security Commission, as recommended by the NPC, to insulate the police from political pressure.
- It has expanded the definition of rape to include all forms of forcible penetration, is eclipsed by the indifference to most of the concerns of the women’s movements. The committee does not favour the death penalty for rapists. The report states that wherever the death penalty is a possible punishment it should be replaced with life imprisonment without commutation or remission.
Candidates can visit the following links to assist themselves and prepare comprehensively for the upcoming UPSC Civil Services Exam-
Malimath Committee – Drawbacks
- While suggesting that the present adversarial system is made inquisitorial, the report does not take into account the increased burden on the court and the need for far greater infrastructure that such a shift would entail.
- In the inquisitorial system as followed in Germany and France there are moves to incorporate features of the adversarial system. The French system had come in for criticism in recent time Given these facts and the practical difficulties involved, the working of the inquisitorial system has to be studied in detail before it can be incorporated into our system.
- Speedy trials, fast-track courts, the huge undertrial population, and access to courts have been neglected.
- Crimes against members of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes do not find mention in the report.
Malimath Committee:- Download PDF Here
Malimath Committee is one of the important topics in Polity for the UPSC Exam Preparation. This article covers the topic comprehensively in both IAS Prelims as well as the UPSC Mains exam perspective.
Multiple Choice Question (MCQ)
Consider the Following Statements
- One of the Drawbacks of the Malimath Committee Report is that crimes against members of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes do not find mention in the report.
- The Malimath Committee does not favour the death penalty for rapists. The report states that wherever the death penalty is a possible punishment, it should be replaced with life imprisonment without commutation or remission.
- The Malimath Committee suggested the setting up of a State Security Commission, as recommended by the NPC, to insulate the police from political pressure.
- The Malimath Committee was given the mandate to review only the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973.
Which of the following statements are true?
A) Only 1, 2, and 3 are true
B) Only 2, 3, and 4 are true.
C) Only 1, 3, and 4 are true.
D) All the 4 statements are True.
Frequently Asked Questions about Malimath Committee
What was the objective of the Malimath Committee?
What was the mandate of the Malimath Committee?
The above details would help candidates prepare for UPSC 2021.