Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in India - Indian Polity Notes

Public Interest Litigation (PIL) implies litigation for the protection of public interests. This is an important concept in law and polity and is often seen in the news. Hence, it acquires importance for the IAS exam. In this article, you can read all about PILs in India.

To complement your preparation for the upcoming exam, check the following links:

Table of Contents:

Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in India

A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is introduced in a court of law not by the aggrieved party but by a private party or by the court itself.

  • PILs have become a potent tool for enforcing the legal obligation of the executive and the legislature.
  • The chief objective behind PILs is ensuring justice to all and promoting the welfare of the people.
  • It is generally used to safeguard group interests and not individual interests, for which Fundamental Rights have been provided.
  • The Supreme Court of India and the High Courts have the right to issue PILs.
  • The concept of PILs stems from the power of judicial review.
  • The concept of PILs has diluted the principle of locus standi, which implies that only the person/party whose rights have been infringed upon can file petitions.
  • It has most ideally and commonly been used to challenge the decisions of public authorities by judicial review, to review the lawfulness of a decision or action, or a failure to act, by a public body.
  • PILs have played an important role in India’s polity. They have been responsible for some landmark judgements in India such as the banning of the instant triple talaq, opened up the doors of the Sabarimala and the Haji Ali shrines to women, legalised consensual homosexual relations, legalised passive euthanasia, and so on.

Procedure to File PIL in India

Any Indian citizen or organisation can move the court for a public interest/cause by filing a petition:

  1. In the SC under Article 32
  2. In the High Courts under Article 226

The court can treat a letter as a writ petition and take action on it. The court has to be satisfied that the writ petition complies with the following: the letter is addressed by the aggrieved person or a public-spirited individual or a social action group for the enforcement of legal or constitutional rights to any person who, upon poverty or disability, are not able to approach the court for redress. The court can also take action on the basis of newspaper reports if it is satisfied with the case.

History of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in India

In 1979, Kapila Hingorani filed a petition and secured the release of almost 40000 undertrials from Patna’s jails in the famous ‘Hussainara Khatoon’ case. Hingorani was a lawyer. This case was filed in the SC before a Bench led by Justice P N Bhagwati. Hingorani is called the ‘Mother of PILs’ as a result of this successful case. The court permitted Hingorani to pursue a case in which she had no personal locus standi making PILs a permanent fixture in Indian jurisprudence.

Justice Bhagwati did a lot to ensure that the concept of PILs was clearly enunciated. He did not insist on the observance of procedural technicalities and even treated ordinary letters from public-minded individuals as writ petitions. Justice Bhagwati and Justice V R Krishna Iyer were among the first judges in the country to admit PILs.

Significance of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in India

The original purpose of PILs has been to make justice accessible to the poor and the marginalised.

  • It is an important tool to make human rights reach those who have been denied rights.
  • It democratises the access of justice to all. Any citizen/agency who is capable can file petitions on behalf of those who cannot or do not have the means to do so.
  • It helps in judicially monitoring state institutions like prisons, asylums, protective homes, etc.
  • It is an important tool in judicial review.

Criticism of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in India

Off late, PILs have become a tool for publicity. People file frivolous petitions which result in the wastage of time of the courts. People have used them with a political agenda as well. They unnecessarily burden the judiciary. Even if the petition is eventually dismissed, the courts spend time and effort on them before dismissing them.

At present, only judges have the power to dismiss a petition. The Registry of the SC or HC only ensures that the technical requirements of filing a petition are fulfilled. As a result of which petitions are admitted to the court irrespective of the merits of the case.

Current Affairs related to PIL in India

Various news keeps on revolving PIL in India as it is one of the most accessible public instruments that can be used to seek judicial action. Check the latest news related to PIL below:

  • PIL was moved to quash the PM CARES fund
  • Public Interest Litigation has been filed in the Supreme Court of India seeking directions to the Government of India to make arrangements in order to rescue and bring the Indian Migrants stranded in Gulf Countries
  • A petition has been filed before the Supreme Court of India, seeking directions to States, their Municipal authorities and local self-government authorities to ensure the protection of rights of the sanitation workers who are also essential service providers amidst the nationwide lockdown in wake of COVID-19 outbreak

Kickstart your UPSC 2021 Preparation today!

Current Affairs - Daily Comprehensive News Analysis

Public Interest Litigation – Indian Polity:-Download PDF Here

Also Read:

Multiple Choice Question

Consider the following statements

  1. PIL is a rule of law declared by the courts of record. However, the person (or entity) filing the petition must prove to the satisfaction of the court that the petition serves the public interest and is not as a frivolous lawsuit brought for monetary gain. 
  2. In Kalyaneshwari vs Union of India, the court cited the misuse of public-interest litigation in business conflicts. A writ petition was filed in the Gujarat High Court seeking the closure of asbestos units, stating that the material was harmful to humans. The high court dismissed the petition, stating that it was filed at the behest of rival industrial groups who wanted to promote their products as asbestos substitutes.
  3. Judicial review is considered a basic structure of the constitution (Indira Gandhi vs Raj Narain Case).
  4. One of the limitations of Judicial Review is, it is only permissible to the extent of finding if the procedure in reaching the decision has been correctly followed but not the decision itself.

Choose the correct answer from the below-given options

A) None of the above statements are true.

B) Only statements 1, 3 and 4 are true.

C) All the above statements are true.

D) Only statements 1 and 4 are true.

Answer: C

Relevant Links


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *