Subordinate Courts

Q. Which of the following explains the concept of 'Pre-litigation Conciliation and Settlement'?

1. A process wherein the Supreme Court brings both parties together to settle a dispute amicably.
2. A process wherein two parties come together to settle a dispute amicably outside of court.
3. The effective implementation of the judgements of the court through government orders.
4. A process in which lawyers are absent from court proceedings and the parties represent themselves.

Q. ____________ is referred to as a consensual process wherein the two parties come together to settle the dispute amicably between them.

1. Pre-litigation Conciliation and Settlement
2. Pre-litigation Conciliation and Consulting
3. Lok Adalats
4. Power of superintendence

Q. Which of the following explains the concept of 'Pre-litigation Conciliation and Settlement'?

1. A process in which lawyers are absent from court proceedings and the parties represent themselves.
2. A process wherein the Supreme Court brings both parties together to settle a dispute amicably.
3. A process wherein two parties come together to settle a dispute amicably outside of court.
4. The effective implementation of the judgements of the court through government orders.

Q. Under which of the following Acts were Lok Adalats established?

1. Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987
2. Legal Services Authorities Act, 1992
3. Legal Services Offerings Act, 1988
4. Legal Services Authorities Act, 1980

Q. ____________ is referred to as a consensual process wherein the two parties come together to settle the dispute amicably between them.

1. Pre-litigation Conciliation and Settlement
2. Pre-litigation Conciliation and Consulting
3. Lok Adalats
4. Power of superintendence

Q. Which of the following acts established the Lok Adalat?

1. Legal Services Authorities Act, 1984
2. Legal Services Authorities Act, 1985
3. Legal Services Authorities Act, 1986
4. Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987

Q. Which of the following Judges played a key role in setting up Lok Adalats?

1. Justice Ranjan Gogoi
2. Justice PN Bhagwati
3. Justice NV Ramana
4. Justice SA Bobde

Q. Mr. Mishra refused to provide a sample even after the police told him they might take action against him under Section 51 of the DMA. In the greater interest of obtaining a sample so as to ensure there was no outbreak in Mr. Mishra’s neighbourhood, the police decided to speak with him again, and this time, they told him that they would also file a case against him under Section 188 of the IPC (in addition to a case under Section 51 of the DMA). Has Mr. Mishra violated both, Section 188 of the IPC, as well as Section 51of the DMA?

1. No, one cannot be prosecuted and punished for the same crime under two different sections of the law.
2. No, since Section 188 of the IPC only applies to the wrongdoings of a public servant.
3. Yes, by refusing to provide a sample, Mr. Mishra had violated both, Section 51 of the DMA as well as Section 188 of the IPC.
4. No, Mr. Mishra has violated neither Section 51 of the DMA nor Section 188 of the IPC.