The Chauhans
Trending Questions
Q. Prithviraja III was defeated by Sultan Muhammad Ghori in the year ________.
- 1190
- 1192
- 1191
- 1194
Q. Identify the dynasty of the king who defeated Sultan Muhammad Ghori in 1191.
- The Chauhans
- The Gahadavalas
- The Gurjara Pratiharas
- The Rashtrakutas
Q. The best-known Chahamana ruler was ___________.
- Prithviraja II
- Prithviraja I
- Prithviraja III
- Nagabhata
Q. The Chahamanas were also known as the _________.
- Gurjara-Pratiharas
- Gahadavalas
- Chauhans
- Rashtrakutas
Q. The Chahamanas ruled the regions around ___________.
- Kannauj and Ajmer
- Delhi and Ajmer
- Gujarat
- South India
Q. Link the correct pairs of dynasties to the regions they ruled over.
- Gahadavalas
- Chauhans
- Rajasthan
- Gujarat
- Delhi
- Western U.P
- Chalukyas
- Gurjara-Pratihar
Q. The Chahamanas were also known as the _________.
- Gurjara-Pratiharas
- Gahadavalas
- Chauhans
- Rashtrakutas
Q. The Chahamanas ruled the regions around ___________.
- Delhi and Ajmer
- Kannauj and Ajmer
- Gujarat
- South India
Q. Identify the dynasties which opposed the expansion plans of the Chauhans.
- The Chalukyas of Gujarat
- The Gahadavalas of Uttar Pradesh
- The Cholas of South India
- The Rashtrakutas
Q. Prithviraja III Chauhan was the first Hindu king of Delhi.
- True
- False
Q. In which battle Muhammed Ghuri Defeated Prithvi raj Chauhan?
- Battle of Bilgram
- First battle of tarai
- Second Battle of Tarai
- First battle of Panipat
Q. Identify the dynasty of the king who defeated Sultan Muhammad Ghori in 1191.
- The Chauhans
- The Gahadavalas
- The Gurjara Pratiharas
- The Rashtrakutas
Q. Statement 1: Prithiviraj Chauhan was the last Hindu king of Delhi.
Statement 2: He was defeated by Sultan Mahmud of Ghazni.
Statement 2: He was defeated by Sultan Mahmud of Ghazni.
- Statement 1 is true and statement 2 is false.
- Statement 1 is false and statement 2 is true.
- Both statements are true and statement 2 is the correct explanation for statement 1.
- Both statements are true and statement 2 is not the correct explanation for statement 1.