Oxidising and Reducing Nature
Trending Questions
Why Lithium is the strongest-reducing agent?
- because I− get oxidised to I2
- because I− is a strong reducing agent
- because I2 is a gas
- because I− is a strong oxidising agent
- because Iodine has electronegativity value
- because I− is a strong reducing agent
- because I2 is a gas
- because Iodine has large size
<!--td {border: 1px solid #ccc;}br {mso-data-placement:same-cell;}--> AIIMS 2014
- Na is used to make a Na/Pb alloy
- MgSO4 is readily soluble in water
- The oxidation state of K in KO2 is +1
- Li+ has minimum degree of hydration
- GeI4
- SnI4
- PbI4
- CI4
Read the following and select one the correct answer.
Statement I: Pb4+ compounds are stronger oxidizing agents than Sn2+ compounds
Statement II: The higher oxidation states for the group 14 elements are more stable for the heavier members of the group due to inert pair effect.
Statement I and Statement II are both correct. Statement II correctly explains Statement I
Statement I and Statement II are both correct. Statement II does not explain Statement I
Statement II is correct and Statement I is wrong
- Statement I is correct and Statement II is wrong
- Sn2+ is reducing while Pb4+ is oxidising
- Sn2+ is oxidising while Pb4+ is reducing
- Sn2+ and Pb2+ are both oxidising and reducing
- Sn4+ is reducing and Pb4+ is oxidising
Of the following, the most stable hydride is
PbH4
SnH4
SiH4
CH4
- C
- Sn
- Pb
- Si
- CI4
- GeI4
- SnI4
- PbI4
Statement - I : CeO2 can be used for oxidation of aldehyde and ketones.
Statement - II : Aqueous solution of EuSO4 is a strong reducing agent.
In the light of the above statements , choose the correct answer from the options given below :
JEE MAINS 2021
- Statement I is true but Statement II is false
- Both Statement I and Statement II are true
- Statement I is false but Statement II is true
- Both Statement I and Statement II are false
- Ge2+>Sn2+>Pb2+
- Sn2+>Ge2+>Pb2+
- Pb2+>Sn2+>Ge2+
- None of these
Carbon and silicon belong to (IV) group. The maximum coordination number of carbon in commonly occurring compounds is 4, whereas that of silicon is 6. This is due to
Large size of silicon
More electropositive nature of silicon
Availability of low lying d-orbitals in silicon
Both (a) and (b)