MyQuestionIcon

1

You visited us 1 times! Enjoying our articles? Unlock Full Access!

Trend in Electronegativity

A great physi...

Question

A great physicist of this century (P.A.M. Dirac) loved playing with numerical values of Fundamental constants of nature. This led him to an interesting observation. Dirac found that from the basic constants of atomic physics (c, e, mass of electron, mass of proton) and the gravitational constant G, he could arrive at a number with the dimension of time. Further, it was a very large number, its magnitude being close to the present estimate on the age of the universe (~15 billion years). From the table of fundamental constants in this book, try to see if you too can construct this number (or any other interesting number you can think of). If its coincidence with the age of the universe were significant, what would this imply for the constancy of fundamental constants?

Open in App

Solution

One relation consists of some fundamental constants that give the age of the Universe by:

Where,

t = Age of Universe

e = Charge of electrons = 1.6 ×10^–19 C

= Absolute permittivity

= Mass of protons = 1.67 × 10^–27 kg

= Mass of electrons = 9.1 × 10^–31 kg

c = Speed of light = 3 × 10⁸ m/s

G = Universal gravitational constant = 6.67 × 10¹¹ Nm² kg^–2

Also,Nm²/C²

Substituting these values in the equation, we get

Suggest Corrections

thumbs-up

0

Similar questions

Q. If the velocity of light

C

, the universal gravitational constant

G

, and Planck's constant

h

are chosen as fundamental units, the dimension of mass in this system are

Q. Classically, an electron can be in any orbit around the nucleus of an atom. Then what determines the typical atomic size? Why is an atom not, say, thousand times bigger than its typical size? The question had greatly puzzled Bohr before he arrived at his famous model of the atom that you have learnt in the text. To simulate what he might well have done before his discovery, let us play as follows with the basic constants of nature and see if we can get a quantity with the dimensions of length that is roughly equal to the known size of an atom (~ 10–10m). (a) Construct a quantity with the dimensions of length from the fundamental constants e, me , and c. Determine its numerical value. (b) You will find that the length obtained in (a) is many orders of magnitude smaller than the atomic dimensions. Further, it involves c. But energies of atoms are mostly in non-relativistic domain where c is not expected to play any role. This is what may have suggested Bohr to discard c and look for ‘something else’ to get the right atomic size. Now, the Planck’s constant h had already made its appearance elsewhere. Bohr’s great insight lay in recognising that h, me , and e will yield the right atomic size. Construct a quantity with the dimension of length from h, me, and e and confirm that its numerical value has indeed the correct order of magnitude.

Classically, an electron can be in any orbit around the nucleus of an atom. Then what determines the typical atomic size? Why is an atom not, say, thousand times bigger than its typical size? The question had greatly puzzled Bohr before he arrived at his famous model of the atom that you have learnt in the text. To simulate what he might well have done before his discovery, let us play as follows with the basic constants of nature and see if we can get a quantity with the dimensions of length that is roughly equal to the known size of an atom

(10^{- 10} m)

.

(a) Construct a quantity with the dimensions of length from the fundamental constants

e, m_{e}, a n d c

. Determine its numerical value.

Q. If Planck's constant (h) and speed of light in vacuum (c) are taken as two fundamental quantities, which one of the following can, in addition be taken to express length, mass and time in terms of the three chosen fundamental quantities ?
i) Mass of electron (

m_{e}

)
ii) Universal gravitational constant (G)
iii) Charge of electron (e)
iv) Mass of proton (

m_{p}

)

Q. The speed of light

c

, gravitational constant

G

and planck’s constant

h

are taken as fundamental units in a system. The dimensions of time in this new system should be

Join BYJU'S Learning Program

similar_icon

Related Videos

lock

Electronegativity

CHEMISTRY

Watch in App

explore_more_icon

Explore more

Trend in Electronegativity

Standard XII Chemistry

Join BYJU'S Learning Program

CrossIcon