A passage is given below followed by several inference . You have to examine each interference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity , Mark your answer as:
Investors today have more investment options than were available just a few years ago. Choice in any decision-making is good in so far it provides variety, differentiation and bench-marking. It could also, however, at times lead to clutter and "noise" if the options are mostly similar and undifferentiated. To make sense of this choice conundrum, it is imperative for an investor to define objective - both returns and digestible risk and then identify the possible options. The investor also needs to select the mix and regularly monitor that objectives and investment outcomes remain aligned. Sounds simple, but can present the most confounding situation which multiplies with the quantum of wealth.
Multiple investment options of similar types helps in making better investment decisions.

If the inference is 'definitely true'

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

If the inference is 'probably true'

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

if the 'data provide in inadequate'

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

If the inference is 'probably false'

Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses

Open in App

Solution

The correct option is D If the inference is 'probably false'
Refer to the second and the third sentences of the passage. They say that choice is good, but they lead to clutter and noise if the products are similar. So, the inference is probably false.

Suggest Corrections

Similar questions

Q. A passage is given below followed by several inference . You have to examine each interference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity , Mark your answer as:
Investors today have more investment options than were available just a few years ago. Choice in any decision-making is good in so far it provides variety, differentiation and bench-marking. It could also, however, at times lead to clutter and "noise" if the options are mostly similar and undifferentiated. To make sense of this choice conundrum, it is imperative for an investor to define objective - both returns and digestible risk and then identify the possible options. The investor also needs to select the mix and regularly monitor that objectives and investment outcomes remain aligned. Sounds simple, but can present the most confounding situation which multiplies with the quantum of wealth.

Investors need to critically evaluate the risk of each investment option.

Q. A passage is given below followed by several inference . You have to examine each interference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity , Mark your answer as:
Investors today have more investment options than were available just a few years ago. Choice in any decision-making is good in so far it provides variety, differentiation and bench-marking. It could also, however, at times lead to clutter and "noise" if the options are mostly similar and undifferentiated. To make sense of this choice conundrum, it is imperative for an investor to define objective - both returns and digestible risk and then identify the possible options. The investor also needs to select the mix and regularly monitor that objectives and investment outcomes remain aligned. Sounds simple, but can present the most confounding situation which multiplies with the quantum of wealth.
Present day investors need to use their judgement more critically before investing.

Q. A passage is given below followed by several inference . You have to examine each interference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity , Mark your answer as:
Investors today have more investment options than were available just a few years ago. Choice in any decision-making is good in so far it provides variety, differentiation and bench-marking. It could also, however, at times lead to clutter and "noise" if the options are mostly similar and undifferentiated. To make sense of this choice conundrum, it is imperative for an investor to define objective - both returns and digestible risk and then identify the possible options. The investor also needs to select the mix and regularly monitor that objectives and investment outcomes remain aligned. Sounds simple, but can present the most confounding situation which multiplies with the quantum of wealth.
In the past , investor were generally guided by the fund managers.

___ may be defined as those decisions, which are related to the investment of funds into different assets in a manner so that the firm is able to earn the highest possible returns for their investors.

Q. Refer to the data.
Mr. Rightsize has the option of investing his severance pay in the shares of one out of four companies available. A positive investment decision is based on four parameters: good management, price of the company's shares (cheaper the better), attractiveness of the industry in which the company operates, and good future growth prospects. Details of the four companies are:
1] Cooch Behar Railroads has a good management, but the industry in which it operate; is not attractive and has limited growth prospects. The company's shares could possibly appear cheap.
2] Alliance Petro also has a good management and the company's shares are cheap. However, the industry in which it operates may possibly not be attractive and definitely has limited growth prospects.
3] eZoooom! is a hot Internet company with a good management. The industry could possibly be attractive, the growth prospects could possibly be good and its shares could possibly appear expensive.
4] BioSync is an attractive industry and the company's shares are certainly expensive. However, either the management is not up to the mark or the company's growth prospects are limited, but not both.
The limited size of the severance pay restricts the possible investment to just one company.
If atleast two parameters need to be positive (of which good management is one) for a positive investment decision, then Rightsize may possibly not invest in:

Join BYJU'S Learning Program

The correct option is D If the inference is 'probably false'Refer to the second and the third sentences of the passage. They say that choice is good, but they lead to clutter and noise if the products are similar. So, the inference is probably false.

The correct option is D If the inference is 'probably false'
Refer to the second and the third sentences of the passage. They say that choice is good, but they lead to clutter and noise if the products are similar. So, the inference is probably false.