According to the passage, which of the following conclusion would be refuted by Kant's defence against Idealism?
A
I
am alive and hence the external world exists
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
B
I
am not alive and hence the external world doesn't exists.
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
C
I
am alive and still the external world doesn't exist
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
D
I
am not alive and still the external world exists.
Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses
Open in App
Solution
The correct option is D
I
am not alive and still the external world exists.
Fifth paragraph last line gives the clue to this question. "Thus, Kant's refutation works so long as I am alive and am able to think about the existence of an external world, yet becomes difficult if I speculate on the consequences of my own non-existence." Also these lines - "No doubt I would cease to exist as a human consciousness, but would it also follow that the external world would also not exist. It is difficult to see how Kant could avoid this conclusion." also show that answer is option (d).