wiz-icon
MyQuestionIcon
MyQuestionIcon
1
You visited us 1 times! Enjoying our articles? Unlock Full Access!
Question

According to the passage, which of the following conclusion would be refuted by Kant's defence against Idealism?


A

I am alive and hence the external world exists

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
B

I am not alive and hence the external world doesn't exists.

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
C

I am alive and still the external world doesn't exist

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
D

I am not alive and still the external world exists.

Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses
Open in App
Solution

The correct option is D

I am not alive and still the external world exists.


Fifth paragraph last line gives the clue to this question.
"Thus, Kant's refutation works so long as I am alive and am able to think about the existence of an external world, yet becomes difficult if I speculate on the consequences of my own non-existence."
Also these lines -
"No doubt I would cease to exist as a human consciousness, but would it also follow that the external world would also not exist. It is difficult to see how Kant could avoid this conclusion." also show that answer is option (d).

flag
Suggest Corrections
thumbs-up
0
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
similar_icon
Related Videos
thumbnail
lock
Sources of Information About the Aryans
HISTORY
Watch in App
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
CrossIcon