As a commentary on legal relations, this folktale is best described as
A
an example of traditional practices
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
B
an outline for social behavior
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
C
a warning about ill-conceived assent
Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses
D
a criticism of obsolete customs
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
E
a parody of actual situations
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
Open in App
Solution
The correct option is C a warning about ill-conceived assent The passage explains through an interpretation of the folk tale that in the Tanaina culture the verbal communication between two people can be a legal contract. Through the beaver's complete assent and without any negotiation with the porcupine woman, the passage warns us about ill-conceived assent. This claim is supported by the following extract:
"A culturally attuned listener would notice, for instance, that when the porcupine woman proposed passage to the beaver, he agreed without any stipulations or clarifications of the terms. He gave a basically open-ended agreement made a contract and hence the porcupine woman was perfectly within her rights both in demanding that he return three times and in quilling him to death when he reneged."