Assertion :An independent negative charge moves itself from point A to point B. Then potential at A should be less than potential at B. Reason: While moving from A to B kinetic energy of electron will increase.

Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation for Assertion

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Both Assertion and Reason are correct but Reason is not the correct explanation for Assertion

Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses

Assertion is correct but Reason is incorrect

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Both Assertion and Reason are incorrect

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Open in App

Solution

The correct option is B Both Assertion and Reason are correct but Reason is not the correct explanation for Assertion
The electric potential energy should decrease from $A$ to $B$ , $U = - e \times V$ where $V$ is the potential at that point.
So if $U_{B} < U_{A} \Rightarrow V_{B} > V_{A}$ i.e., potential at $A$ is less than that at $B$ .
As potential energy decreases, the kinetic energy increases from $A$ to $B$ .
Thus both the assertion and reason are correct but reason is not the correct explanation of the assertion.

Suggest Corrections

Similar questions

Q. Assertion: In the equation,

y = A sin (k x - ω t)

, particle starts from its mean position

x = 0

and moves towards negative

y -

axis.
Reason: The wave corresponding to given equation is travelling towards positive

x -

direction.

Q. Assertion: The compressibility factor for

H_{2}

and

H e

(1 + \frac{P b}{R T})

Reason: The compressibility factor for

H_{2}

and

H e

can be derived from Van der Waal's equation.

Assertion (A) All collision of reactant molecules lead to product formation.

Reason (R) Only those collisions in which molecules have correct orientation and sufficient kinetic energy lead to compound formation.

(a) Both assertion and reason are correct and the reason is correct explanation of assertion
(b) Both assertion and reason are correct, but reason does not explain assertion.
(c) Assertion is correct, but reason is incorrect
(d) Both assertion and reason are incorrect
(e) Assertion is incorrect but reason is correct.

Assertion (A) p-nitrophenol is more acidic than phenol.
Reason (R) Nitro group helps in the stabilisation of the phenoxide ion by dispersal of negative charge due to resonance.
(a) Assertion and reason both are correct and reason is correct explanation of assertion.
(b) Assertion and reason both are wrong statements.
(c) Assertion is correct statement but reason is wrong statement.
(d) Assertion is wrong statement but reason is correct statement.
(e) Both assertion and reason are correct statements but reason is not correct explanation of assertion.

ASSERTION: n-Pentane and n-Hexane belong to a homologous series.

REASON: n-Pentane and n-Hexane belong to the same class of hydrocarbons and they differ by a - $C H_{2}$ - group.

Join BYJU'S Learning Program