Analysing the assertion
Aromatic aldehydes and formaldehyde do not contain
α−hydrogen and thus undergo Cannizzaro reaction. For example, benzaldehyde reacts with conc.
KOHsolution and undergoes Cannizzaro’s reaction.
Cannizzaro’s reaction of formaldehyde is shown below:
So, the assertion is correct.
Analysing the reason
Formaldehyde is more reactive than aromatic aldehydes in nucleophilic addition reactions. This is due to the electron-donating resonance effect of the aromatic rings which makes carbonyl carbon less electron deficient. The attack of a nucleophile on less electron deficient carbon is slower than the attack on formaldehyde. Another reason for slow reaction of aromatic aldehydes as compared to formaldehyde is the steric crowding.
A nucleophile faces more difficulty while attacking on more crowded aromatic aldehydes and hence the reaction is slower.
So, the reason is incorrect.
Mechanism of Reaction
Step 1: Nucleophilic attack on the carbonyl group to give a anion.
Step 2: Conversion of the anion to a carboxylate ion and another aldehyde molecule to an alkoxide ion.
Step 3: Protonation of methoxide to methanol.
Conclusion: Assertion is a correct statement but reason is wrong statement. So, option (C) is the correct answer.