Assertion :Bohr had to postulate that the electrons in stationary orbits around the nucleus do not radiate. Reason: According to classical physics all moving electrons radiate.

Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation for Assertion

Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses

Both Assertion and Reason are correct but Reason is not the correct explanation for Assertion

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Assertion is correct but Reason is incorrect

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Assertion is incorrect but Reason is correct

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Open in App

Solution

The correct option is A Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation for Assertion
Drawbacks of Rutherford model : This theory could not explain the stability of an atom. According to Maxwell electron loses it's energy continuously in the form of electromagnetic radiations. As a result of this, the e should loss energy at every turn and move closer and closer to the nucleus following a spiral path. The ultimate result will be that it will fall into nucleus, thereby making the atom unstable.
So, Bohr had to postulate that the electrons in stationary orbits around the nucleus do not radiate to give stable atomic model.

Suggest Corrections

Similar questions

{2n}^{2}

H_{2}

H e

(1 + \frac{P b}{R T})

H_{2}

H e

{SiO}_{2}

{CaCO}_{3}

CaO

{CaCO}_{3}

{SiO}_{2}

Assertion – The non-fusible impurities present in iron ore are removed by $C a C O_{3}$ .

Reason: $C a C O_{3}$ which decomposes into $C a O$ and $C O_{2}$ . The $C a O$ formed reacts with $S i O_{2}$ to remove silica

Assertion: All the points (1, 0), (-1, 0), (2, 0) and (5, 0) lie on the x – axis.
Reason: Equation of the x-axis is y = 0

Choose the correct option.

Join BYJU'S Learning Program