Assertion :Conformers are impractical to separate. Reason: Conformers have negligibly small difference in their potential energy.

Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation for Assertion

Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses

Both Assertion and Reason are correct but Reason is not the correct explanation for Assertion

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Assertion is correct but Reason is incorrect

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Both Assertion and Reason are incorrect

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Open in App

Solution

The correct option is A Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation for Assertion
Conformers have negligible energy difference and thus are impractical to separate.
Hence, both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation for Assertion

Suggest Corrections

Similar questions

H_{2}

H e

(1 + \frac{P b}{R T})

H_{2}

H e

ASSERTION: n-Pentane and n-Hexane belong to a homologous series.

REASON: n-Pentane and n-Hexane belong to the same class of hydrocarbons and they differ by a - $C H_{2}$ - group.

Assertion: Be and Al have similar properties.

Reason: $B e^{2 +}$ and $A l^{3 +}$ have nearly the same charge/volume ratios and similar polarising power.

Assertion – The non-fusible impurities present in iron ore are removed by $C a C O_{3}$ .

Reason: $C a C O_{3}$ which decomposes into $C a O$ and $C O_{2}$ . The $C a O$ formed reacts with $S i O_{2}$ to remove silica

Assertion

Lithium sulphate does not form alums.

Reason

$L i^{+}$ is too small to form a stable lattice required for double-salt/alum formation.

Join BYJU'S Learning Program