Assertion :Copper(II) iodide is not known. Reason: $C u^{2 +}$ oxidises $I^{-}$ to $I_{2}$ .

Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation for Assertion

Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses

Both Assertion and Reason are correct but Reason is not the correct explanation for Assertion

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Assertion is correct but Reason is incorrect

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Both Assertion and Reason are incorrect

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Open in App

Solution

The correct option is A Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation for Assertion
$C u^{+ 2}$ is more stable than $C u^{+}$ (due to high hydration enthalpy),in case of iodine, $C u^{+ 2}$ oxidizes $I^{-}$ to $I_{2}$ .Hence Copper( $I I$ ) iodide is not known.

Suggest Corrections

Similar questions

H_{2}

H e

(1 + \frac{P b}{R T})

H_{2}

H e

ASSERTION: n-Pentane and n-Hexane belong to a homologous series.

REASON: n-Pentane and n-Hexane belong to the same class of hydrocarbons and they differ by a - $C H_{2}$ - group.

Assertion – The non-fusible impurities present in iron ore are removed by $C a C O_{3}$ .

Reason: $C a C O_{3}$ which decomposes into $C a O$ and $C O_{2}$ . The $C a O$ formed reacts with $S i O_{2}$ to remove silica

Assertion

Lithium sulphate does not form alums.

Reason

$L i^{+}$ is too small to form a stable lattice required for double-salt/alum formation.

Join BYJU'S Learning Program