Assertion :Elements and compounds are the examples of pure substances. Reason: The properties of a compound are different from those of its constituent elements.

Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation for Assertion

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Both Assertion and Reason are correct but Reason is not the correct explanation for Assertion

Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses

Assertion is correct but Reason is incorrect

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Both Assertion and Reason are incorrect

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Open in App

Solution

The correct option is B Both Assertion and Reason are correct but Reason is not the correct explanation for Assertion
Pure substances are defined as substances that are made of only one type of atom or molecule. Thus Elements and compounds are the examples of pure substances.

The physical properties of a pure substance include well-defined melting and boiling points.
The properties of a compound are different from those of its constituent elements.
Both Assertion and reason are correct statements but are not related.

Hence, option $B$ is correct.

Suggest Corrections

Similar questions

Assertion (A) All collision of reactant molecules lead to product formation.

Reason (R) Only those collisions in which molecules have correct orientation and sufficient kinetic energy lead to compound formation.

(a) Both assertion and reason are correct and the reason is correct explanation of assertion
(b) Both assertion and reason are correct, but reason does not explain assertion.
(c) Assertion is correct, but reason is incorrect
(d) Both assertion and reason are incorrect
(e) Assertion is incorrect but reason is correct.

Q. Assertion: The compressibility factor for