Assertion : Gauss's law of magnetism is different from that for electrostatics.
Reason : Isolated magnetic poles are not known to exist.

If both assertion and reason are true and reason is the correct explanation of assertion.

Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses

If both assertion and reason are true and reason is not the correct explanation of assertion.

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

If assertion is true but reason is false.

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

If both assertion and reason are false.

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Open in App

Solution

The correct option is B If both assertion and reason are true and reason is the correct explanation of assertion.
Gauss's law of magnetism is different from that for electrostatics because electric charges do not necessarily exist in pairs but magnetic monopoles do not exist.

Suggest Corrections

Similar questions

Read the assertion and reason carefully to mark the correct option out of the options given below :

(a) If both assertion and reason are true and the reason is the correct explanation of the assertion.

(b) If both assertion and reason are true but reason is not the correct explanation of the assertion.

(d) If the assertion and reason both are false.

(e) If assertion is false but reason is true.

Assertion: Acetic acid does not undergo haloform reaction.

Reason: Acetic acid has no alpha hydrogens.

\to τ = \to r \times \to F b u t \to τ \neq \to F \times \to r .

Join BYJU'S Learning Program