Assertion :If $0 < α < (π / 4)$ , then the equation $(x - s i n α) (x - c o s α) - 2 = 0$ has both roots in $(s i n α, c o s α)$ . Reason: If $f (a)$ and $f (b)$ possess opposite signs, then there exists at least one solution of the equation $f (x) = 0$ in open interval $(a, b)$ .

Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation for Assertion

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Both Assertion and Reason are correct but Reason is not the correct explanation for Assertion

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Assertion is correct but Reason is incorrect

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Assertion is incorrect but Reason is correct

Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses

Open in App

Solution

The correct option is D Assertion is incorrect but Reason is correct
Reason is true.
Assertion: $f (x) = (x - sin α) (x - cos α) - 2 f (sin α) = - 2 < 0 f (cos α) = - 2 < 0$ .
Then there exists no roots in $(sin α, cos α)$ .

Suggest Corrections

Similar questions

Assertion: All the points (1, 0), (-1, 0), (2, 0) and (5, 0) lie on the x – axis.

Reason: Equation of the x – axis is y = 0
Now, choose the correct option.

Q. Assertion: In the equation,

y = A sin (k x - ω t)

, particle starts from its mean position

x = 0

and moves towards negative

y -

axis.
Reason: The wave corresponding to given equation is travelling towards positive

x -

direction.

Assertion (A) Order of the reaction can be zero or fractional.

Reason (R) We cannot determine order from balanced chemical equation.

(a) Both assertion and reason are correct and the reason is correct explanation of assertion
(b) Both assertion and reason are correct, but reason does not explain assertion.
(c) Assertion is correct, but reason is incorrect
(d) Both assertion and reason are incorrect
(e) Assertion is incorrect but reason is correct.

Assertion (A) o-nitrophenol is less soluble in water than the m- and p-isomers.
Reason (R) m and p-nitrophenols exist as associated molecules.
(a) Assertion and reason both are correct and reason is correct explanation of assertion.
(b) Assertion and reason both are wrong statements.
(c) Assertion is correct statement but reason is wrong statement.
(d) Assertion is wrong statement but reason is correct statement.
(e) Both assertion and reason are correct statements but reason is not correct explanation of assertion.

Q. Assertion: The compressibility factor for

H_{2}

and

H e

(1 + \frac{P b}{R T})

Reason: The compressibility factor for

H_{2}

and

H e

can be derived from Van der Waal's equation.

Join BYJU'S Learning Program

Assertion :If 0<α<(π/4), then the equation (x−sinα)(x−cosα)−2=0 has both roots in (sinα,cosα). Reason: If f(a) and f(b) possess opposite signs, then there exists at least one solution of the equation f(x)=0 in open interval (a,b).

The correct option is D Assertion is incorrect but Reason is correctReason is true.Assertion:f(x)=(x−sinα)(x−cosα)−2f(sinα)=−2<0f(cosα)=−2<0.Then there exists no roots in (sinα,cosα).

Assertion :If $0 < α < (π / 4)$ , then the equation $(x - s i n α) (x - c o s α) - 2 = 0$ has both roots in $(s i n α, c o s α)$ . Reason: If $f (a)$ and $f (b)$ possess opposite signs, then there exists at least one solution of the equation $f (x) = 0$ in open interval $(a, b)$ .

The correct option is D Assertion is incorrect but Reason is correct
Reason is true.
Assertion: $f (x) = (x - sin α) (x - cos α) - 2 f (sin α) = - 2 < 0 f (cos α) = - 2 < 0$ .
Then there exists no roots in $(sin α, cos α)$ .