Assertion -If dipole P- - -1- is moved along the line normal to the axis dotted line shown of another dipole P- - -2- their interaction energy does not change and Reason- Electric field of P- - -2- at the position of P- - -1- is normal to P- - -1-

You visited us 1 times! Enjoying our articles? Unlock Full Access!

PE Diagram

Assertion :If...

Question

Assertion :If dipole $_{1}$ is moved along the line normal to the axis (dotted line shown) of another dipole $_{2}$ , their interaction energy does not change and Reason: Electric field of $_{2}$ at the position of $_{1}$ is normal to $_{1}$

Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation for Assertion

Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses

Both Assertion and Reason are correct but Reason is not the correct explanation for Assertion

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Assertion is correct but Reason is incorrect

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Assertion is incorrect but Reason is correct

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Open in App

Solution

The correct option is A Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation for Assertion
For motion of dipole $P_{1}$ relative to $P_{2}$ the electric field will remain perpendicular to each other as shown in the figure.
Where as the interaction energy wont change as the force between each dipole wont change much
Hence option A is correct

Suggest Corrections

Similar questions

Assertion: All the points (1, 0), (-1, 0), (2, 0) and (5, 0) lie on the x – axis.
Reason: Equation of the x-axis is y = 0

Choose the correct option.

Q. Assertion: In the equation,

y = A sin (k x - ω t)

, particle starts from its mean position

x = 0

and moves towards negative

y -

axis.
Reason: The wave corresponding to given equation is travelling towards positive

x -

direction.

Q. Assertion: The compressibility factor for

H_{2}

and

H e

(1 + \frac{P b}{R T})

Reason: The compressibility factor for

H_{2}

and

H e

can be derived from Van der Waal's equation.

Assertion (A) Rate constant determined from Arrhenius equation are fairly accurate for simple as well as complex molecules.

Reason (R) Reactant molecules undergo chemical change irrespective of their orientation during collision.

(a) Both assertion and reason are correct and the reason is correct explanation of assertion
(b) Both assertion and reason are correct, but reason does not explain assertion.
(c) Assertion is correct, but reason is incorrect
(d) Both assertion and reason are incorrect
(e) Assertion is incorrect but reason is correct.

Assertion

Lithium sulphate does not form alums.

Reason

$L i^{+}$ is too small to form a stable lattice required for double-salt/alum formation.

Join BYJU'S Learning Program

Assertion :If dipole →P1 is moved along the line normal to the axis (dotted line shown) of another dipole →P2, their interaction energy does not change and Reason: Electric field of →P2 at the position of →P1 is normal to →P1

Assertion :If dipole $_{1}$ is moved along the line normal to the axis (dotted line shown) of another dipole $_{2}$ , their interaction energy does not change and Reason: Electric field of $_{2}$ at the position of $_{1}$ is normal to $_{1}$