The correct option is
A Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation for Assertion
z2+z+1=0 then z=ω and ω2
We know that
ω3=1 also ω2+ω=−1
Now,
When k divided by 3 leaves remainder 1
i.e. k=3n+1,so w−k=ω2 and ωk=ω
then ωk+ω−k=−1
When k divided by 3 leaves remainder 2
i.e. k=3n+2, so ω−k=ω and ωk=ω2
then ωk+ω−k=−1
When k divided by 3 leaves remainder 0
i.e. k=3n, so ω−k=1 and ωk=1
then ωk+ω−k=2
Thus, considering ω we have
3∑1(zk+z−k)2=1+1+4=6
which can be written as 3+3[33]
6∑1(zk+z−k)2=1+1+4+1+1+4=12
which can be written as 6+3[63]
9∑1(zk+z−k)2=1+1+4+1+1+4+1+1+4=18
which can be written as 9+3[93]
and so on...
Thus, we can say that
n∑1(zk+z−k)2=n+3[n3]
Hence, option A.