Assertion :In beta decay, the direction of the recoiling daughter nucleus is opposite to that of the beta particle emitted. Reason: In beta decay, beta particles are not emitted with a fixed energy.

Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation for Assertion

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Both Assertion and Reason are correct but Reason is not the correct explanation for Assertion

Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses

Assertion is correct but Reason is incorrect

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Assertion is incorrect but Reason is correct

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Open in App

Solution

The correct option is B Both Assertion and Reason are correct but Reason is not the correct explanation for Assertion
Assertion

In beta decay, the direction of the recoiling daughter nucleus is opposite to that of the beta particle emitted.

Reason

In beta decay, beta particles are not emitted with a fixed energy.

Both Assertion and Reason are correct but Reason is not the correct explanation for Assertion.

The force of gravity is stronger on Earth than on the moon. (A) Both the Assertion and the Reason are correct and the Reason is the correct explanation of the Assertion. ... (C) Our Assertion is true but the Reason is false. (D) The statement of the Assertion is false but the Reason is true.

Suggest Corrections

Similar questions

H_{2}

H e

(1 + \frac{P b}{R T})

H_{2}

H e

{SiO}_{2}

{CaCO}_{3}

CaO

{CaCO}_{3}

{SiO}_{2}

Assertion – The non-fusible impurities present in iron ore are removed by $C a C O_{3}$ .

Reason: $C a C O_{3}$ which decomposes into $C a O$ and $C O_{2}$ . The $C a O$ formed reacts with $S i O_{2}$ to remove silica

y = A sin (k x - ω t)

x = 0

y -

x -

Join BYJU'S Learning Program