Assertion :Nitric acid stains the skin Reason: Nitric acid reacts with proteins to form yellow nitrated products is formed when the acid contacts epithelial cells of skin giving it a stain.

Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation for Assertion

Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses

Both Assertion and Reason are correct but Reason is not the correct explanation for Assertion

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Assertion is correct but Reason is incorrect

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Both Assertion and Reason are incorrect

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Open in App

Solution

The correct option is A Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation for Assertion
When nitric acid comes in contact with skin, it reacts with the protein, keratin to produce yellow colour nitrated products called xanthoproteic acid.
In this $NO_{2}$ gets attached to the protein of the skin which results in making the skin strained.
Also when acids reacts with the epithelial cells present on the skin, strain is produced.
Hence assertion and reason are correct and reason incorrect explanation for the assertion.

Suggest Corrections

Similar questions

Q. Assertion: The impurities such as

{SiO}_{2}

present in iron ore is removed by

{CaCO}_{3}

.

Reason:

CaO

formed by decomposition of

{CaCO}_{3}

reacts with

{SiO}_{2}

to form slag.

Assertion – The non-fusible impurities present in iron ore are removed by $C a C O_{3}$ .

Reason: $C a C O_{3}$ which decomposes into $C a O$ and $C O_{2}$ . The $C a O$ formed reacts with $S i O_{2}$ to remove silica

Assertion

Lithium sulphate does not form alums.

Reason

$L i^{+}$ is too small to form a stable lattice required for double-salt/alum formation.

Q. Assertion: The compressibility factor for

H_{2}

and

H e

(1 + \frac{P b}{R T})

Reason: The compressibility factor for

H_{2}

and

H e

can be derived from Van der Waal's equation.

Assertion (A) Ethanol is a weaker acid than phenol.
Reason (R) Sodium ethoxide may be prepared by the reaction of ethanol with aqueous NaOH.
(a) Assertion and reason both are correct and reason is correct explanation of assertion.
(b) Assertion and reason both are wrong statements.
(c) Assertion is correct statement but reason is wrong statement.
(d) Assertion is wrong statement but reason is correct statement.
(e) Both assertion and reason are correct statements but reason is not correct explanation of assertion.

Join BYJU'S Learning Program