Assertion :Nitrogen doesn't form compound of the type $N_{2}^{+} [P t F_{6}]$ (Ionisation potential of $N_{2}$ is $1403 k J m o l^{- 1}$ ) Reason: Oxygen and xenon which have ionisation energies, $1180 k J m o l^{- 1}$ and $1170 k J m o l^{- 1}$ , respectively, can be oxidised by $P t F_{6}$ while nitrogen having comparatively much higher ionisation energy, $1403 k J m o l^{- 1}$ cannot be oxidised, so a compound of the type $[N_{2}]^{+} [P t F_{6}]^{-}$ cannot be formed.

Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation for Assertion

Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses

Both Assertion and Reason are correct but Reason is not the correct explanation for Assertion

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Assertion is correct but Reason is incorrect

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Both Assertion and Reason are incorrect

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Open in App

Solution

The correct option is A Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation for Assertion
Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation for Assertion as oxygen and xenon which have ionisation energies, $1180 k J m o l^{- 1}$ and $1170 k J m o l^{- 1}$ , respectively, can be oxidised by $P t F_{6}$ while nitrogen having comparatively much higher ionisation energy, $1403 k J m o l^{- 1}$ cannot be oxidised. So, a compound of the type $[N_{2}]^{+} [P t F_{6}]^{-}$ cannot be formed.

Suggest Corrections

Similar questions

Q. Assertion: The compressibility factor for

H_{2}

and

H e

(1 + \frac{P b}{R T})

Reason: The compressibility factor for

H_{2}

and

H e

can be derived from Van der Waal's equation.

Assertion (A) Order of the reaction can be zero or fractional.

Reason (R) We cannot determine order from balanced chemical equation.

(a) Both assertion and reason are correct and the reason is correct explanation of assertion
(b) Both assertion and reason are correct, but reason does not explain assertion.
(c) Assertion is correct, but reason is incorrect
(d) Both assertion and reason are incorrect
(e) Assertion is incorrect but reason is correct.

Assertion (A) All collision of reactant molecules lead to product formation.

Reason (R) Only those collisions in which molecules have correct orientation and sufficient kinetic energy lead to compound formation.

Assertion: Be and Al have similar properties.

Reason: $B e^{2 +}$ and $A l^{3 +}$ have nearly the same charge/volume ratios and similar polarising power.

Q. Assertion: Average kinetic energy in one oscillation during

SHM

of a body is

\frac{1}{4} m ω^{2} A^{2}

.
Reason: Maximum kinetic energy is

\frac{1}{2} m ω^{2} A^{2}

Join BYJU'S Learning Program