Assertion :Potential is work done to bring a point charge from infinity to to required point under the influence of electric field. Reason: Gravitational potential is analogous to electric potential and have same dimensions.

Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation for Assertion

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Both Assertion and Reason are correct but Reason is not the correct explanation for Assertion

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Assertion is correct but Reason is incorrect

Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses

Both Assertion and Reason are incorrect

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Open in App

Solution

The correct option is C Assertion is correct but Reason is incorrect
Potential at a point in the electric field is defined as work done in moving a unit charge from infinity to that point. So, the statement is the correct definition of electric potential but the reason given is not correct.

Suggest Corrections

Similar questions

ASSERTION: n-Pentane and n-Hexane belong to a homologous series.

REASON: n-Pentane and n-Hexane belong to the same class of hydrocarbons and they differ by a - $C H_{2}$ - group.

Assertion: Be and Al have similar properties.

Reason: $B e^{2 +}$ and $A l^{3 +}$ have nearly the same charge/volume ratios and similar polarising power.

H_{2}

H e

(1 + \frac{P b}{R T})

H_{2}

H e

Assertion

Lithium sulphate does not form alums.

Reason

$L i^{+}$ is too small to form a stable lattice required for double-salt/alum formation.

Assertion – The non-fusible impurities present in iron ore are removed by $C a C O_{3}$ .

Reason: $C a C O_{3}$ which decomposes into $C a O$ and $C O_{2}$ . The $C a O$ formed reacts with $S i O_{2}$ to remove silica

Join BYJU'S Learning Program