Assertion :The $p K_{a}$ value of (I) is lower than the $p K_{a}$ value of (II). Reason: Non-aromatic compounds are more stable than anti-aromatic compounds.

Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation for Assertion

Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses

Both Assertion and Reason are correct but Reason is not the correct explanation for Assertion

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Assertion is correct but Reason is incorrect

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Assertion is incorrect but Reason is correct

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Open in App

Solution

The correct option is A Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation for Assertion

(I) is non-aromatic and (II) is antiaromatic.
Non-aromatic compounds are more stable than antiaromatic.
Hence, (I) is a stronger acid than (II).
Hence, it has lower $p K a$ value.
Thus, Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation for Assertion.

Suggest Corrections

Similar questions

Π

H_{2}

H e

(1 + \frac{P b}{R T})

H_{2}

H e

Assertion

Lithium sulphate does not form alums.

Reason

$L i^{+}$ is too small to form a stable lattice required for double-salt/alum formation.

Assertion – The non-fusible impurities present in iron ore are removed by $C a C O_{3}$ .

Reason: $C a C O_{3}$ which decomposes into $C a O$ and $C O_{2}$ . The $C a O$ formed reacts with $S i O_{2}$ to remove silica

Join BYJU'S Learning Program