The correct option is
A Assertion is True, reason is True ; reason is a correct explanation for assertion
Factorizing the given equation, we obtain
(a−√3b)x+(b+√3a)y=0 ...(1)
and (a+√3b)x+(b−√3a)y=0 ...(2)
We call these lines as OA and OB, respectively.
Now, ax+by+c=0 ...(3)
is the equation of the line AB.
The angle between the lines (1) and (3) is given by
tanθ1=ab−a−√3bb+√3a1+(ab)(a−√3bb+√3a)=ab−√3a2−ab+√3b2b2+√3ab+a2−√3ab=√3(a2−b2)(a2+b2)=√3.
∴θ1=600.
The angle between the lines (2) and (3) is given by
tanθ2=a+√3bb−√3a−ab1+ab(a+√3bb−√3a)=√3(a2+b2)(a2+b2)=√3.
∴θ2=600
Since θ1+θ2=1200, therefore, the angle between (1) and (2) must be 600.
Hence, △OAB is equilateral.
Now, area of △OAB=12×OL×AB=OL×AL=OL×OLcot600 (∵tan600=OLAL)
=1√3OL2=1√3[c√a2+b2]2
(∵OL is the ⊥ distance)
from O to the line (3)
=c2√3(a2+b2)
Thus the given reason is the correct explanation of the statement.