Based on the statement, identify strong/weak arguments.
Statement: Should the council of ministers once appointed be kept the same for the entire period intervening two elections?
Arguments: I. No. Shuffling of ministers and portfolios is a healthy democratic process. II. Yes. The ministers do not get a hold on their portfolio unless they are kept for a longer duration.
A
Only argument I is strong
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
B
Only argument II is strong
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
C
Either I or II is strong
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
D
Neither I nor II is strong
Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses
E
Both I and II are strong
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
Open in App
Solution
The correct option is D Neither I nor II is strong Shuffling of Cabinet ministers is just not a regular process, but a step to ensure proper working and implementation of schemes and avoid corruption. So, none of the arguments holds strong.