Before the advent of writing, each of the isolated clans of the X tribe had master story tellers whose function was to orally transmit the clan's tradition from one generation to the next. When writing was developed within certain clans of the tribe, their master story tellers disappeared within a few generations. This stands to reason, since the availability of written records obviated the need for masterful oral communicators to keep the tradition of literate clans alive. What has puzzled anthropologists, however, is the total lack of masterful storytellers in modern illiterate X clans. Which of the following, if true, best helps to explain the puzzling situation mentioned above?
Modern illiterate X clans are recently descended from long time literate clans that failed to pass on the skills of reading and writing due to a devastating 75-year war.
Option (c)
Option (a) does nothing to explain why the modern literate clans lack storytellers. Personality similarities don't have any clear relationship to literacy and storytellers.
Option (b) A comparison of the frequency of clan gatherings also does not in any way explain why the current illiterate tribes lack storytellers.
Option (c)would explain the discrepancy. If it were true, then the storytellers did disappear when the clans became literate, but they subsequently lost that literacy. Thus the modern tribes could both be illiterate and storytellers, as is the case in the questions statement, and they could have lost their storytellers during an earlier literate period. The answer to the discrepancy is found in this answer option; thus option (C) is correct.
Option (d) Talks about the rituals of the moderate clans without any focus on the "literacy”. This is a junk option.