wiz-icon
MyQuestionIcon
MyQuestionIcon
1
You visited us 1 times! Enjoying our articles? Unlock Full Access!
Question

Consider the following two statement

S1:All clear explanations are satisfactory,
S2: Some excuses are unsatisfactory

Which one of the following statement follows from S1 and S2 as per inference rules of logiv ?

A
Some explantions are clear excuses
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
B
Every excuses are not clear explanations.
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
C
Some excuses are not clear explanations
Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses
D
Some excuses are clear explanations.
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
Open in App
Solution

The correct option is C Some excuses are not clear explanations
S1:x(clear (x)(satisfactory (x))
S2:(Excuse(x)¬satisfactory (x))
S1 by using contrapositive rule
S3:x(¬ satisfactory (x)¬ clear (x))
By using S2 and S3
x(excuse (x) not clear(i))i.e., some excuses are not clear explanation

flag
Suggest Corrections
thumbs-up
1
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
similar_icon
Related Videos
thumbnail
lock
Quantum Numbers
CHEMISTRY
Watch in App
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
CrossIcon