The correct option is C The premise are inconsistent and the conclusion P follows from the premises
option (c)
Assume that all the premises are true.
Case 1 : C is T (T is for truth value true)
Then A is F. (F is for truth value false)
Since C∨E is T, D is T,
Therefore A ∨∼D is F.
Hence, C∧B is F and ∼∨∼B is T.
Thus, E ∧∼D
is T, and D is F, which is impossible.
Case 2 : C is F.
Thus ∼C is T,
and therefore so is ∼C ∨∼B.
It follows that E ∧∼D is T.
And therefore E is T and D is F.
Since C∨E is T, then D is T, which is a contradiction.
Hence, the given premises are inconsistent.
If the premises are inconsistent then any conclusion P follows from the premises.