Determine whether each of the following relations are reflexive, symmetric and transitive:
(i)Relation R in the set A = {1, 2, 3...13, 14} defined as
R = {(x, y): 3x − y = 0}
(ii) Relation R in the set N of natural numbers defined as
R = {(x, y): y = x + 5 and x < 4}
(iii) Relation R in the set A = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} as
R = {(x, y): y is divisible by x}
(iv) Relation R in the set Z of all integers defined as R = {(x, y): x − y is an integer}
(v) Relation R in the set A of human beings in a town at a particular time given by
(a) R = {(x, y): x and y work at the same place}
(b) R = {(x, y): x and y live in the same locality}
(c) R = {(x, y): x is exactly 7 cm taller than y}
(d) R = {(x, y): x is wife of y}
(e) R = {(x, y): x is father of y}
(i) (a) Given that, A={1,2,.....,13,14} and R is ={(x,y)}:3x-y =0} for reflexive (x,x)ϵ R ∀ x ϵ A
∴ If y=x,3x−y=0⇒2x≠0,R is not reflexive.
⇒(x,x)/ϵR.
(b)Given R ={(x,y):3x-y=0} for symmetric relation (x,y)ϵR
⇒(y,x)ϵR
If (x,y)ϵR⇒3x−y=0, then 3y−x≠0⇒(y,x)/ϵR, so R is not symmetric.
For example; if x =1, y =3, 3×1−3=0,3×3−1=9−1=8≠0
(c)For transitive, if (x,y)ϵR⇒3x−y=0,(y,z)ϵR⇒3y−z=0, then 3x−z≠0. So, R is not transitive
For example, when x=1, y=3, z=9, then 3×1−3=0,3×3−9=0,3×1−9≠0
Here, A=N, the set of natural numbers and R={(x,y);y=x+5,x<4}
={(x,x+5):xϵN and x < 4}
={(1,6),(2,7),(3,8)}
(a)For reflexive x,xϵR∀x putting y=x,x≠y+5⇒(1,1)/ϵR. So, R is not reflexive.
(b)For symmetrical (x,y)ϵR⇒(y,x)ϵR putting y =x+5, then x≠y+5⇒(1,6)ϵR but (6,1)/ϵR. So, R is not symmetric.
(c)For transitivity (x,y)ϵR,(y,z)ϵR⇒(x,z)ϵR if y =x+5, z=y+5, then z≠x+5. Since, (1,6)ϵR and there is no order pair in R which has 6 as the first element same in the case for (2,7)and (3,8). So, R is not transitive
(a) For reflexive, we know that x is divisible by x for all xϵA.
∴(x,x)ϵR for all xϵR. So, R is reflexive.
(b)For symmetry, we know that x is divisible by 2. This means that (2,6)ϵR but (6,2) doesnotbelongtoR. So, R is not symmetric.
(c)For transitiviety, let (x,y)\ belongs R and (y,z)ϵR, then z is divisible by x.
⇒(x,z)ϵR
For example, 2 is divisible by 1,4 is divisible by 2
So, 4 is divisible by 1 so, R is transitive.
For reflexive put y=x, x-x =0 which is an integer for all xϵZ. So, R is reflexive on Z.
(b)For symmetry let (x,y)ϵR, then (x-y)is an integer λ and also y−x=−λ[∵λϵZ⇒−λϵZ]
∴y−x is an integer ⇒(y,x)ϵR. SO, R is symmetric.
(c)For transitivity let (x,y) belongs R and (y,z)ϵR∴x−y = integer and y-z = integer, then x-z is also an integer
∴(x,z)ϵR. So, R is transitive
(a)R is reflexive, symmetric and transitive obviously.( For reflexive (x, x ) work in same place. For symmetric (x,y) and (y,x) work in same place. For transitive (x,y) , (y,z) work at same place place means (x,z) work at same place)
(b)R is reflexive, symmetric and transitive obviously.( For reflexive (x, x ) live in same locality. For symmetric (x,y) and (y,x) live in same locality. For transitive (x,y) , (y,z) live in same locality means (x,z) live in same locality)
(c)Here, R is not reflexive as x is not 7 cm taller than x itself . R is not symmetric as if x is exactly 7 cm taller than y, then y exactly 7 cm taller than x is incorrect and not transitive as x is exactly 7 cm taller than y and y is exactly 7 cm taller than z , then x is exactly 7 cm taller than z is incorrect
(d)Here, R is not reflexive; as x is not wife of x, R is not symmetric, as if x is wife of y. then y is husband (not wife)of x and R is not transitive as x is wife of y and y is wife of z is contradicted .
(e)Here, R is not reflexive; as x cannot be father of x. For any x, R is not symmetric as if x is father of y, then y cannot be father of x. R is not transitive as if x is father of y and y is father of z, then x is grandfather (not father)of z.