During the SARS days, about 23,500 doctors who had treated SARS sufferers died and about 23,670 doctors who had not engaged in treatment for SARS sufferers died. On the basis of those figures, it can be concluded that it was not much more dangerous to participate in SARS treatment during the SARS day than it was not to participate in SARS treatment.

Which of the following would reveal most clearly the absurdity of the conclusion drawn above?

Counting deaths among doctors who had participated in SARS treatment in addition to deaths among doctors who had not participated in SARS treatment

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Separating deaths caused by accidents during the treatment to SARS suffers from deaths caused by infect of SARS suffers.

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Comparing death rates per thousand members of each group rather than comparing total numbers of deaths

Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses

None of above

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Open in App

Solution

The correct option is C
Comparing death rates per thousand members of each group rather than comparing total numbers of deaths

Most logically such comparison should reveal mortality rate per thousand doctors indulged in SARS treatment and not indulged in treatment.

Suggest Corrections

Similar questions

Q. During the Second World War, about 375,000 civilians died in the United States and about 408,000 members of the United States armed forces died overseas. On the basis the those figures, it can be concluded that it was not much more dangerous to be overseas in the armed forces during the Second World War than it was to stay at home as a civilian.

Which of the following would reveal most clearly the absurdity of the conclusion drawn above?

Q. Which of the following relates to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)?

Q. The disease, SARS is due to the following virus.

Q. Which of the following organs is affected by SARS virus?

There’s a lot of misinformation and half-truths going around right now about the novel coronavirus. That’s understandable — the virus is very new and doctors and scientists are still learning about how the infection works and best ways to treat it. The news being reported about tests, symptoms, and treatments is conflicting at times, which is confusing. Plus, everyone wants to protect themselves as best they can, so it makes sense that people will try anything to stave off the virus, proven or not.
There is no research yet on whether zinc will impact the novel coronavirus, officially named SARS-CoV-2. However, zinc may interfere with the other six coronaviruses, including the original SARS and the four coronaviruses that cause the common cold.

Q. With reference to the above passage, which of the following statements can be considered true?

Statements:

Select the correct answer using the code given below:

1 only
2 only
Both 1 and 2
Neither 1 nor 2

Join BYJU'S Learning Program

The correct option is C Comparing death rates per thousand members of each group rather than comparing total numbers of deaths Most logically such comparison should reveal mortality rate per thousand doctors indulged in SARS treatment and not indulged in treatment.

The correct option is C
Comparing death rates per thousand members of each group rather than comparing total numbers of deaths

Most logically such comparison should reveal mortality rate per thousand doctors indulged in SARS treatment and not indulged in treatment.