MyQuestionIcon

1

You visited us 1 times! Enjoying our articles? Unlock Full Access!

Right to Constitutional Remedies

Each question...

Question

Each question below is followed by arguments. Choose the most appropriate choice from the options given.
Question : Should Judicial Activism be discouraged ?
Argument I : No, it would lead to executive dictatorship
Argument II: Yes, Judiciary should stay in the constitutional limits

A

Argument I is strong

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

B

Argument II is strong

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

C

Both the arguments are strong

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

D

Both the arguments are weak

Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses

Open in App

Solution

The correct option is D Both the arguments are weak
Both the arguments given in the question are weak.Judicial activism leading to executive dictatorship is an exaggeration of the situation . Similarly , 'Judiciary should stay in constitutional limits' is not reason enough . Why it should stay within constitutional limits or what effects it will have are not mentioned , making it a weak argument. Hence, correct option is(d).

Suggest Corrections

thumbs-up

0

Similar questions

Q. Statement : Should judicial activism be discouraged ?
Arguments :
I. No. If we leave everything in the hands of executive, justice may be distant dream.
II. Yes. Judiciary should mind its own business. Executive will take its own course.

Q. 21. In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong; arguments and ‘weak’ arguments. ‘Strong’ arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. ‘Weak’ arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.
Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to choose strong argument(s).
Statement: Should students take part in politics?
Arguments:
1. Yes. It includes in them qualities of leadership.
2. No. They should study and build up their career.

Q. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a strong argument or which is a weak argument.

Statement: Should higher education be restricted only to the most deserving ones?
Arguments: I. No, it is against the principle of democracy.

II. Yes, only deserving people are entitled to this luxury.

The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a strong argument and which is a weak argument.

Statement : Colour TV should be introduced in India.

Arguments : I. Yes, because it is introduced in foreign countries also.
II. No, India cannot afford it.

The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a strong argument or which is a weak argument.

Statement : Should India manufacture computers?
Arguments : I. Yes, why not?
II. No, we do not have the technical expertise.

View More

Join BYJU'S Learning Program

similar_icon

Related Videos

lock

Right to Constitutional Remedies

CIVICS

Watch in App

explore_more_icon

Explore more

Right to Constitutional Remedies

Standard IX Civics

Join BYJU'S Learning Program

CrossIcon