CameraIcon
CameraIcon
SearchIcon
MyQuestionIcon
MyQuestionIcon
1
You visited us 1 times! Enjoying our articles? Unlock Full Access!
Question

Editorial: The roof of Northtown's municipal equipment-storage building collapsed under the weight of last weeks heavy snowfall. The building was constructed recently and met local building-safety codes in every particular except that the nails used for attaching roof supports to the nails used for attaching roof supports to the buildings columns were of a smaller size than the codes specify for this purpose. Clearly this collapse exemplifies how even a single apparently insignificant departure from safety standards can have serve consequences.


Which of the following if true most seriously weakens the editorials argument?

A
The only other buildings to suffer roof collapses from the weight of the snowfall were older buildings constructed according to less exacting standards than those in the codes.
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
B
The amount of snow that accumulated on the roof of the equipment-storage building was greater than the predicted maximum that was used in drawing up the safety codes.
Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses
C
Because the equipment storage building was not intended for human occupation some safety-code provisions that would have applied to an office building did not apply to it.
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
D
The municipality of Northtown itself has the responsibility for ensuring that buildings constructed within its boundaries meet the provisions of the building safety codes.
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
E
Because the equipment storage building was used for storing snow-removal equipment the building was almost completely empty when the roof collapsed.
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
Open in App
Solution

The correct option is A The amount of snow that accumulated on the roof of the equipment-storage building was greater than the predicted maximum that was used in drawing up the safety codes.
Here, option A seems to be out of context, the only purpose it serves is to reinforce what the question states. C, D and E are irrelevant to the context given. Option B directly weakens the editorial's argument because it implies that the collapse was probably due to snow and not the nails. It takes the argument beyond the nails and weakens it. Thus, B is the answer

flag
Suggest Corrections
thumbs-up
0
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
similar_icon
Related Videos
thumbnail
lock
Rail Disasters
GEOGRAPHY
Watch in App
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
CrossIcon