Euclid's division lemma states that for any positive integers a and b, there exist unique integers q and r such that a = bq + r, where r must satisfy
(a) 1 < r < b (b) 0<r≤b (c) 0≤r<b (d) 0 < r < b
Here we need to argue that q and r are no unique
Let us assume q and r are not unique i.e. let there exists another pair q0 andr0 i.e. a = b×q0+r0, where 0 ≤r0 < b
=> b×q+ r = b×q0+r0
=>b×(q−q0) =r0- r ................ (I)
Since 0≤r<b and0≤r0<b , thus0≤ (r0- r)< b ........ (II)
The above eq (I) tells that b dividesr0- r and r0- r is an integer less than b. This means r0- r must be 0.
=>r0- r = 0
=> r =r0
Eq (I) will be, b×(q−q0) = 0
Since b > 0, => (q−q0) = 0
=> q = q0
Since r =r0 and q =q0 , Therefore q and r are unique.
hence
(c) 0≤r<b is correct option