CameraIcon
CameraIcon
SearchIcon
MyQuestionIcon
MyQuestionIcon
1
You visited us 1 times! Enjoying our articles? Unlock Full Access!
Question

For the first row transition metals the \(\rm~E^\ominus\) values are:

\(\rm~\begin{matrix}
\rm~E^\ominus & \rm~V & \rm~Cr & \rm~Mn & \rm~Fe & \rm~Co & \rm~Ni & \rm~Cu \\
(\rm~M^{2+}/M) & -1.18 & -0.91 & -1.18 & -0.44 & -0.28 & -0.25 & +0.34
\end{matrix}\)

Explain the irregularity in the above values.

Open in App
Solution

\(\text{Irregularity in \(E^\ominus\) values of first row transition metals}\)

From \(\rm~V\) to \(\rm~Cr\), \(\rm~E^0\) value becomes less negative because ionization energy and enthalpy of atomisation both increase.

From \(\rm~Cr\) to \(\rm~Mn\) it becomes more negative due to extra stability of \(\rm~Mn^{2+}\) (\(\rm~d^5\) configuration’s extra stability. Now From \(\rm~Mn\) to \(\rm~Fe\) its value again decreases due to increase in enthalpy of atomisation and I.E of \(\rm~Fe\).
The irregular variation of \(\rm~E^0(M^{2+}/M)\) can be explained by ionisation enthalpies \((\rm~\Delta _iH_1 + \Delta _iH_2)\) and also the sublimation enthalpies which are relatively much less for manganese and vanadium.

From \(\rm~Fe\) to \(\rm~Ni\) the value becomes less and less negative and in the end for \(\rm~Cu\) its positive, as enthalpy of atomisation and I.E both increases.

flag
Suggest Corrections
thumbs-up
11
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
CrossIcon