wiz-icon
MyQuestionIcon
MyQuestionIcon
1
You visited us 1 times! Enjoying our articles? Unlock Full Access!
Question

Given below is a statement of legal principle followed by factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts and select the most appropriate answer.


PRINCIPLE: A second suit will not be heard on the same facts between the same parties.

FACTS: Nakshatra files a suit against Chandra for getting possession of a house on the ground that the property passed on to her through the will executed by Surya before his death. The suit gets dismised as Nakshatra fails to produce the will. Nakshatra files another suit against Chandra to get the same house from the latter, on the ground that she was entitled to the house as being the nearest heir of Surya.

DECIDE

A
Nakshatra will succeed as she is the nearest heir of Surya.
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
B
Nakshatra will not succeed as the facts in both the cases are the same.
Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses
C
Nakshatra will succeed as the facts in the two cases deal with different situations.
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
D
Nakshatra will succeed as the grounds in the second case were not taken in the first one owing to the mistake of her advocate.
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
Open in App
Solution

The correct option is B Nakshatra will not succeed as the facts in both the cases are the same.
Nakshatra won't succeed as the facts are same.
The above mentioned principle can be denoted as 'doctrine of res judicata'. Section 11 of Civil procedure code tells about this principle. This principle tells that when the same party with the same facts, that is, the second suit won't be hearable in the court.
Hence, B is the correct option.

flag
Suggest Corrections
thumbs-up
0
similar_icon
Similar questions
Q. This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principles') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the "most reasonable conclusion" arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
Principle: If a contract is made by post between two persons living in two different cities, then the contract is said to be completed as soon as the letter of acceptance is properly posted and the place of completion of the contract is that city where acceptance is posted. It is worth mentioning here that in every contract there is always an offer from one party and the acceptance of the offer from the other party.
Facts: Sani, a resident of Patna, gives an offer by post to sell his house for Rs.25 lach to Hani, a resident of Allahabad. This offer letter is posted on 1st January,2013 from Patna and reaches Allahabad on 7th January,2013. Hani accepts this offer and posts the letter of acceptance on 8th January,2013 from Allahabad which reaches Patna on 16th January,2013. But Sani presuming that Hani is not interested in accepting his offer, sells his house to Gani at same price on 15th of January, 2013. Hani files a suit gainst Sani for the breach of contract in the competent court of Allahabad. Whether Hani will succeed?
View More
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
similar_icon
Related Videos
thumbnail
lock
The Lok Adalat and the LSA
HISTORY
Watch in App
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
CrossIcon