How was the Civil Disobedience Movement different from the Non-Cooperation Movement?

Open in App

Solution

Non- Cooperation Movement Civil Disobedience Movement
It was launched in 1920s.
It was launched in 1930s.
The Non-Cooperation Movement sought to bring the working of the government to a standstill by not cooperating with the administration. The Civil Disobedience Movement was an attempt at paralysing the administration by breaking some specific rules & regulations.
There were no tax campaigns in this movement.
It involved non- payment of taxes & land-revenue as well as violation of laws.
Many leaders renounced their titles & left their government jobs.
It involved defiance of salt laws, boycott of liquor, foreign cloth & British goods of all kinds.
It was not violent until the Chauri Chaura incident took place. The movement became violent in a matter of time.

Suggest Corrections

Similar questions

Assertion (A): The Civil Disobedience Movement was different from the Non-cooperation Movement.

Reason (R): People in the Civil Disobedience Movement were asked not only to refuse cooperation with the British but also to break colonial laws.

Select the correct option from the given alternatives.

Join BYJU'S Learning Program

Non- Cooperation Movement	Civil Disobedience Movement
It was launched in 1920s.	It was launched in 1930s.
The Non-Cooperation Movement sought to bring the working of the government to a standstill by not cooperating with the administration.	The Civil Disobedience Movement was an attempt at paralysing the administration by breaking some specific rules & regulations.
There were no tax campaigns in this movement.	It involved non- payment of taxes & land-revenue as well as violation of laws.
Many leaders renounced their titles & left their government jobs.	It involved defiance of salt laws, boycott of liquor, foreign cloth & British goods of all kinds.
It was not violent until the Chauri Chaura incident took place.	The movement became violent in a matter of time.