CameraIcon
CameraIcon
SearchIcon
MyQuestionIcon
MyQuestionIcon
200
You visited us 200 times! Enjoying our articles? Unlock Full Access!
Question

I. "The Kansas-Nebraska Act authorizes the further extension of slavery and we have, do now, and will continue to protest most emphatically against slavery." (1854)

II. "The territories were the common property of the several states. As a joint agent of the states, Congress has no power to deny the citizens of any state the right to take their property into a territory Therefore slavery is legal in the territories. If Wilmot carries, woe, woe I say to the union." (1850)

III. "We beg the slave owners to pause before they proceed further to disturb the peace we had hoped the Compromise of 1850 would have made perpetual." (1854)

Which of the above statement(s) would John C. Calhoun have supported?


A
I
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
B
II
Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses
C
III
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
D
I and III
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
E
II and III
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
Open in App
Solution

The correct option is B II

John C. Calhoun would have supported the statement present in Option 2. The territories were the common property of the several states. As a joint agent of the states, Congress has no power to deny the citizens of any state the right to take their property into a territory. Therefore slavery is legal in the territories. If Wilmot carries, woe, woe I say to the union.


flag
Suggest Corrections
thumbs-up
0
similar_icon
Similar questions
View More
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
similar_icon
Related Videos
thumbnail
lock
Constitution and Political Rights
CIVICS
Watch in App
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
CrossIcon