Question

Identify the alternative which best explains the relation between the arguments mentioned below:
Arguments:
1. It is highly probable that every student of Law at University level would have done a course on principles of ethics and Rama being a student of law, in all probability, would have done a course on principles of ethics.
2. At University level, every faculty aims at super speciality for which emphasis is laid upon structuring the curricula in such away that every faculty is treated as a closed system so that no inter-disciplinary study is acceptable. Principles of ethics being essentially an integral part of philosophy, most probably is out of any course on law.

• A. Two argument are mutually independent
• B. Two arguments are mutually supportive
• C. Two arguments are supplementary
• D. They are incompatible

Answer 1

The correct option is D They are incompatible

Argument 1 talk about a course in ethics in a Law University ; Argument 2 , on the other hand says the same course is most probably out of any course of law. Hence , the statements are incompatible with each other.