If gravitational force is dependent on mass, then why does a heavy object not fall faster than a light object?

Open in App

Solution

This is because although the force is proportional to the mass of the body, the acceleration is independent of its mass.
$m a = \frac{G M m}{r^{2}}$
$\Rightarrow a = \frac{G M}{r^{2}}$ , which is independent of the mass of the body.

Suggest Corrections

Similar questions

Gravitational force acts on all objects in proportion to their masses. Why then, a heavy object does not fall faster than a light object?

Q. Question 2
Gravitational force acts on all objects in proportion to their masses. Why then, a heavy object does not fall faster than a light object?

Q. Assertion :A heavy object always falls faster than a light object when dropped from a height. Reason: Gravitational force is proportional to the mass of an object.

A light object and heavy object are placed on two identical vehicles. The lighter object falls but the heavy one doesn't. But if mass is directly proportional to inertia the light object shouldn't have resisted much to its change in state of motion while the vice versa should have happened to the heavier object. Then why does it differ in the real world?

Q. If Earth exerts a gravitational force on the moon, why doesn't the moon fall into the Earth?
Also write what happens to the gravitational force between any two objects when
(a) mass of one of the object increases
(b) distance between the object increases.

Join BYJU'S Learning Program

If gravitational force is dependent on mass, then why does a heavy object not fall faster than a light object?

This is because although the force is proportional to the mass of the body, the acceleration is independent of its mass. ma=GMmr2 ⇒a=GMr2, which is independent of the mass of the body.

This is because although the force is proportional to the mass of the body, the acceleration is independent of its mass.
$m a = \frac{G M m}{r^{2}}$
$\Rightarrow a = \frac{G M}{r^{2}}$ , which is independent of the mass of the body.