wiz-icon
MyQuestionIcon
MyQuestionIcon
1
You visited us 1 times! Enjoying our articles? Unlock Full Access!
Question

In each group of questions below are two/three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the two/three statements, disregarding commonly known facts. Give answer
Statements: No lawyers are enthusiastic.
All enthusiastic people are positive.
No positive people are honest.
Conclusions: I. No honest people are enthusiastic.
II. All positive people being lawyers is a possibility.

A
if only conclusion I follows.
Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses
B
if only conclusion II follows.
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
C
if either conclusion I or conclusion II follows.
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
D
if neither conclusion I nor conclusion II follows.
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
E
if both conclusion I and conclusion II follow.
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
Open in App
Solution

The correct option is C if only conclusion I follows.
Conclusion I: Honest people are no where connected to positive people. So, it can never be connected to enthusiastic people. It follows.
Conclusion II: Positive people can never be connected to Lawyers. It doesn't follow.
Answer : A

783476_764833_ans_d6c3548f551049b38024609e35d74669.png

flag
Suggest Corrections
thumbs-up
0
similar_icon
Similar questions
View More
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
similar_icon
Related Videos
thumbnail
lock
Fair Trial
CIVICS
Watch in App
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
CrossIcon