CameraIcon
CameraIcon
SearchIcon
MyQuestionIcon
MyQuestionIcon
1
You visited us 1 times! Enjoying our articles? Unlock Full Access!
Question

In each question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.
Statements: My first and foremost task is to beautify this city - if city X and Y can do it - why can't we do it. - Statement of Municipal Commissioner of city Z after taking over charge.
Conclusions:
I. The people of city Z are not aware about the present state of ugliness of their city
II. The present Commissioner has worked in city X and Y and has good experience of beautifying cities

A
Only conclusion I follows
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
B
Only conclusion II follows
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
C
Either I or II follows
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
D
Neither I nor II follows
Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses
E
Both I and II follow
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
Open in App
Solution

The correct option is B Neither I nor II follows
The Commissioner only cites examples of cities X and Y and undertakes to beautify city Z. This does not imply that he has worked in cities X and Y. So, I do not follow. Also, nothing about people's response to the state of the city can be deduced from the statement. Thus, II also does not follow.

flag
Suggest Corrections
thumbs-up
0
similar_icon
Similar questions
View More
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
similar_icon
Related Videos
thumbnail
lock
MATHEMATICS
Watch in App
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
CrossIcon