In what way was the administration of the Company different from that of Indian rulers?
Open in App
Solution
The last powerful ruler was Aurangazeb. A large part of Indian territory was under him.
Many big zamindars and Mughal governors (subadars) began establishing regional kingdoms and asserting their authority, after the death of Aurangazeb in 1707.
Presidencies were the administrative units of British territories in India.
Bombay, Madras and Bengal were the three Presidencies.
To rule these Presidencies, there was a Governor.
In the administration, the Governor-General was the Supreme Head.
In the sphere of Justice, the first Governor-General (Warren Hastings) implemented different administrative reforms particularly in the domain of Justice.
A new system of justice was introduced from 1772.
They created two courts for each district – diwani adalat (a civil court) and faujdari adalat (a criminal court).
The civil courts were presided over by European district collectors; the Hindu Pandits and Maulvis helped them in interpreting Indian laws.
Under the supervision of the collectors, the criminal courts were still under a mufti and qazi.
Collector was the main figure in the Indian district.
The mandate of the collector was to maintain law and order in his district with the help of darogas, police officers, and judges.
The main task of the collector was to collect the taxes and revenue.
The previous holders of authority were steadily replaced by the Collectorate which became the new centre of patronage and power.
A court of appeal – the Sadar Nizamat Adalat was set up at Calcutta and a new Supreme Court was established under the Regulating Act of 1773.